Slavery in Western Hemisphere
In this thread, I'll post random effort (or semi-effort posts) I've made elsewhere.
Slavery as an institution in Roman and pre-Roman times was very different for an educated or domestic slave. Unfortunately, I'll bet there were a lot of non-educated slaves who are not recorded in the history books. The life of a domestic slave in the US (and Brazil) was not horrible compared to field/labor slaves, borne out by the life expectancy numbers of places where there weren't as many plantations.
Surprisingly, slavery in the territories of the United States of America was among the least objectionable in the Western Hemisphere (which isn't saying much). And better than any on the Caribbean islands or in Brazil. And probably better than most sub-Saharan African slavery.
Haiti with it's sugar plantation and French colonial status killed slaves through hard labor and punishment faster than they could reproduce, resulting in a constant influx of slaves from West Africa. The average life expectancy of a slave was short. Big chunks of that were because slave women were so undernourished and over worked that infant mortality and death in childbirth was common. Even otherwise, the life expectancy of a male field slave wasn't much past thirty or forty, and for an imported field slave, they would often only live 7-9 more years. Somehow the slaves managed to overthrow the ruling whites only to fall back onto sugar plantations with forced labor themselves.
The Spanish Encomienda was a brutal thing that sort of fell short of slavery, but the effects on the native population was brutal. Disease outbreaks of things like smallpox hit a population with no immunity, poor nutrition, and under harsh labor. According to some estimates over 80% of the native population of Mexico died, how much is attributable to the various causes is unclear, but it devastated the native population. And in Nicaragua and Guatemala hundreds of thousands were taken into slavery. It was so bad, that the system was replaced in 1550 by Repartimiento to curb the worst excesses of Encomienda. The Spanish enslavement occurred well before Jamestown was ever established.
The Brazilian sugar plantations were among the worst places to be, though they were apparently better than Haiti, and Brazil apparently accepted the greatest number of West African slaves, 4.9 million according to Wikipedia. The average life expectancy of an African slave in Brazil was 23 years, which was 4 more years than the indigenous slaves.
I do not say this to excuse slavery in the USA. I think it was indefensible.
General readers, especially in the US, don't seem to know how bad slavery got. They don't know the whos, the whats, or the wheres, let alone the whys.
There is an interesting discussion about life expectancy (which I am using a proxy for how physically bad slavery was) on Quora, which should be able to point you to further sources. Generally speaking, the difference in life expectancy between whites and slaves in the US was much smaller than the difference in life expectancy between slaves and whites in the rest of the Western Hemisphere. Interestingly, the official importation of slaves into the United States was abolished in 1807 (effective January 1st, 1808). However, the population of slaves in the United States grew 4 fold between 1810 and 1860, which means that in strict physical terms, slavery in the US was less brutal than Haitian slavery who had to import to maintain (and grow) the number of slaves.
So think about that the next time you stir some sugar into your coffee (or tea).
I have not done the research on sub-Saharan slavery, or slavery in Muslim countries (which were among the last to abolish traditional slavery). For some depressing information, look at how many countries slavery was still legal after 1950 (if they abolished it after 1950, it was legal before then).
Slavery as an institution in Roman and pre-Roman times was very different for an educated or domestic slave. Unfortunately, I'll bet there were a lot of non-educated slaves who are not recorded in the history books. The life of a domestic slave in the US (and Brazil) was not horrible compared to field/labor slaves, borne out by the life expectancy numbers of places where there weren't as many plantations.
Surprisingly, slavery in the territories of the United States of America was among the least objectionable in the Western Hemisphere (which isn't saying much). And better than any on the Caribbean islands or in Brazil. And probably better than most sub-Saharan African slavery.
Haiti with it's sugar plantation and French colonial status killed slaves through hard labor and punishment faster than they could reproduce, resulting in a constant influx of slaves from West Africa. The average life expectancy of a slave was short. Big chunks of that were because slave women were so undernourished and over worked that infant mortality and death in childbirth was common. Even otherwise, the life expectancy of a male field slave wasn't much past thirty or forty, and for an imported field slave, they would often only live 7-9 more years. Somehow the slaves managed to overthrow the ruling whites only to fall back onto sugar plantations with forced labor themselves.
The Spanish Encomienda was a brutal thing that sort of fell short of slavery, but the effects on the native population was brutal. Disease outbreaks of things like smallpox hit a population with no immunity, poor nutrition, and under harsh labor. According to some estimates over 80% of the native population of Mexico died, how much is attributable to the various causes is unclear, but it devastated the native population. And in Nicaragua and Guatemala hundreds of thousands were taken into slavery. It was so bad, that the system was replaced in 1550 by Repartimiento to curb the worst excesses of Encomienda. The Spanish enslavement occurred well before Jamestown was ever established.
The Brazilian sugar plantations were among the worst places to be, though they were apparently better than Haiti, and Brazil apparently accepted the greatest number of West African slaves, 4.9 million according to Wikipedia. The average life expectancy of an African slave in Brazil was 23 years, which was 4 more years than the indigenous slaves.
I do not say this to excuse slavery in the USA. I think it was indefensible.
General readers, especially in the US, don't seem to know how bad slavery got. They don't know the whos, the whats, or the wheres, let alone the whys.
There is an interesting discussion about life expectancy (which I am using a proxy for how physically bad slavery was) on Quora, which should be able to point you to further sources. Generally speaking, the difference in life expectancy between whites and slaves in the US was much smaller than the difference in life expectancy between slaves and whites in the rest of the Western Hemisphere. Interestingly, the official importation of slaves into the United States was abolished in 1807 (effective January 1st, 1808). However, the population of slaves in the United States grew 4 fold between 1810 and 1860, which means that in strict physical terms, slavery in the US was less brutal than Haitian slavery who had to import to maintain (and grow) the number of slaves.
So think about that the next time you stir some sugar into your coffee (or tea).
I have not done the research on sub-Saharan slavery, or slavery in Muslim countries (which were among the last to abolish traditional slavery). For some depressing information, look at how many countries slavery was still legal after 1950 (if they abolished it after 1950, it was legal before then).