Well, my phone is blowing up with news alerts that the DA's office is charging the Trump Organization and the CFO, but from what I remember reading on National Review, it's pretty low-level stuff and is basically the DA hoping that the CFO will flip on Trump (though that assumes a) the CFO is willing and b) that there's anything concrete to charge Trump with).
Funny how Trump mentions this "evidence" but never put anything that met the legal standard on display in court. Not to mention it overlooks his stunts with picking a fight with McConnell over the stimulus checks after the fact and then his subsequent rally in Georgia that wound up depressing Republican turnout for the runoff. Or how Barr, who is a long-serving constitutional lawyer and who served administrations for many years told him to put up or shut up, yet they never did. Trump simply said Barr must hate him...because making Trump follow the law and constitutional procedure somehow equals hating Trump.