Thread Derail & Derailment Repository

[Vyor]

Why? you keep insisting,that dude without helmet could survive on modern battlefield long enough to get into melee.
Sorry,not going to happen.
Even if bulletproof bones existed,except eys orks had nose and ears,too.Even dudes with fucking muskets or longbows would take him down.

And,about breathing - we could just use napalm.Even if his bones are bulletproof,it still would not save him from that.

He's made out of fucking fungus and is powered by a psychic gestalt that is created by a bunch of football hooligans really enjoying fighting.

 

[StormEagle]

Would you guys stop talking about the fucking Orks?!

Take it to one of the warhammer threads. This one’s for talking about a real life Bond villain, not semi-sapient mushrooms!

 

[Typhonis]

Even though the mushrooms have a better personality?

 

[DarthOne]

Ironically this will end all gun control laws.

Hey @Sailor.X does Humanity start getting Materia too? Cause that's a whole can of worms in an of itself.

Only if we’re willing to ignore our overlords. Who WILL be using the situation to gain ‘emergency powers’.

Remember, we’re largely ruled by people who think that there’s too many people living on Earth and want to fix that.

 

[Spartan303]

Only if we’re willing to ignore our overlords. Who WILL be using the situation to gain ‘emergency powers’.

Remember, we’re largely ruled by people who think that there’s too many people living on Earth and want to fix that.

Those Overlords don't stay overlords being that blatantly stupid. As many of them are finding out now.

 

[DarthOne]

Those Overlords don't stay overlords being that blatantly stupid. As many of them are finding out now.

That’s funny, I wasn’t aware of any government being overthrown or major political figures being thrown behind bars, executed or assassinated…

 

[Sailor.X]

Only if we’re willing to ignore our overlords. Who WILL be using the situation to gain ‘emergency powers’.

Remember, we’re largely ruled by people who think that there’s too many people living on Earth and want to fix that.

That won't work the Military itself would ignore orders that sacrifice the citizens to the monsters. This is a major global problem. And the family of these said service people are at stake. They will do what is necessary.

 

[Spartan303]

That’s funny, I wasn’t aware of any government being overthrown or major political figures being thrown behind bars, executed or assassinated…

Things are not quite severe enough for that. But they are losing popular support and getting voted out. Bit that's another topic. Let's stay focused on this.

 

[DarthOne]

That won't work the Military itself would ignore orders that sacrifice the citizens to the monsters. This is a major global problem. And the family of these said service people are at stake. They will do what is necessary.

Which is why, if our overlords had any sense, they’d rescue the families of service members and then seclude them from the rest of the population that they want to survive. Which not only protects said family from any reprisals from the general population, but allows them to control them and if nay service members get rebellious, the overlords and their thugs have easy access to them as hostages. Or just throw them back into the general population who will happily take revenge on them.

Things are not quite severe enough for that. But they are losing popular support and getting voted out. Bit that's another topic. Let's stay focused on this.

Yeah, because voting has worked so well. It hasn’t stopped Europe from being flooded by rapeugees, despite people voting against it. Hasn’t stopped much of anything in the USA either.

But agreeded that’s enough off-topic talk.

 

[Sailor.X]

Which is why, if our overlords had any sense, they’d rescue the families of service members and then seclude them from the rest of the population that they want to survive. Which not only protects said family from any reprisals from the general population, but allows them to control them and if nay service members get rebellious, the overlords and their thugs have easy access to them as hostages. Or just throw them back into the general population who will happily take revenge on them.


Yeah, because voting has worked so well. It hasn’t stopped Europe from being flooded by rapeugees, despite people voting against it. Hasn’t stopped much of anything in the USA either.

But agreeded that’s enough off-topic talk.

Think before you type. Do you have any earthly idea how many people that is. Dude don't post stupid stuff.

 

[mrttao]

National guard member defects to Russia

A former USAF serviceman and Holyoke City Councilor reportedly joined Putin's military in Ukraine after fleeing the US amid child pornography charges.

www.newsweek.com

Yet another pedo defected to Russia... How many is that in total?

> Child pornography charges

that is pretty bad.

> He was a 24 year old USA politician.
> A 17 year old "child" sent him naked selfies.
> he sent her money
> then she informed the police of the transactions.
> "she told the police he knew she was underaged at the time" - so all they have for it is her word. rather than... say... texts from him confirming he knew her age

ok that is totally not what I expected when they said child pornography charges.
looks like a classic CIA sting.

 

[Vyor]

> Child pornography charges

that is pretty bad.

> He was a 24 year old USA politician.
> A 17 year old "child" sent him naked selfies.
> he sent her money
> then she informed the police of the transactions.
> "she told the police he knew she was underaged at the time" - so all they have for it is her word. rather than... say... texts from him confirming he knew her age

ok that is totally not what I expected when they said child pornography charges.
looks like a classic CIA sting.

... there is no way that works.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

... there is no way that works.

Dude panicked and ran to Russia. Sure as shit worked.

 

[Vyor]

Dude panicked and ran to Russia. Sure as shit worked.

I meant legally.

 

[Husky_Khan]

Yeah "told the police" is just journalist brevity. We have no idea what the context of it is since I'm assuming none of us have actually read the court documents and AFAIK the law typically states you have to "knowingly possess child pornography" as opposed to unknowingly doing so.

I'm going out on a limb and assuming a 98% chance that there is corroborating statements from witnesses and/or actual possession of child pornography on one of this patriots devices instead of the victim just "telling the police." And probably other skeevy nonsense surrounding it as well because usually this sort of behavior doesn't occur with otherwise morally virtuous paladins.

Doesn't mean he would've been guilty, but likely bringing it to trial is probably more than just "trust me bro."

 

[Poe]

Yeah "told the police" is just journalist brevity. We have no idea what the context of it is since I'm assuming none of us have actually read the court documents and AFAIK the law typically states you have to "knowingly possess child pornography" as opposed to unknowingly doing so.

I'm going out on a limb and assuming a 98% chance that there is corroborating statements from witnesses and/or actual possession of child pornography on one of this patriots devices instead of the victim just "telling the police." And probably other skeevy nonsense surrounding it as well because usually this sort of behavior doesn't occur with otherwise morally virtuous paladins.

Doesn't mean he would've been guilty, but likely bringing it to trial is probably more than just "trust me bro."

17 is the age of consent in most states, the exceptions are usually younger than that not older. If it is considered child porn here its a technicality where the porn is illegal but actual sex isn't which would be strange (but stranger laws exist.) It's tacky and maybe immoral but not pedophilia unless there is some other crime I haven't seen here.

 

[Zachowon]

Federal age is 18.
That means any thing sent via phone or the like has to be of an 18 or older

 

[Husky_Khan]

17 is the age of consent in most states, the exceptions are usually younger than that not older. If it is considered child porn here its a technicality where the porn is illegal but actual sex isn't which would be strange (but stranger laws exist.) It's tacky and maybe immoral but not pedophilia unless there is some other crime I haven't seen here.

Good thing the pedophile wasn't charged with pedophilia but the possession of child pornography then. Which honestly, if the Newsweek story is remotely true, means he had to put at least a minimum of effort into getting the child pornography. An effort, financially and otherwise, that would've been more costly then getting a Pornhub subscription or whatever.

Like seriously, if he wanted barely illegal looking child pornography, there's probably lots of websites with younger looking women who are actually over 18. Yet... apparently the CIA managed to get him charged in spite of these resources being available for folks like him just solely based on the word of the victim (as if).

Needless to say, I doubt this is a CIA string. If it is, it's a real low effort one. It's probably run of the mill creepiness and degeneracy. He got better press with a third of the country though because he followed the example of others and patriotically defected to Russia though.

 

[AmosTrask]

17 is the age of consent in most states, the exceptions are usually younger than that not older. If it is considered child porn here its a technicality where the porn is illegal but actual sex isn't which would be strange (but stranger laws exist.) It's tacky and maybe immoral but not pedophilia unless there is some other crime I haven't seen here.

Anyone older than 19 soliciting sexual anything from 17 and younger, especially if the relationship started after the older person turned 18. Barring special circumstances, deserves only flaying alive.

 

[mrttao]

Like seriously, if he wanted barely illegal looking child pornography, there's probably lots of websites with younger looking women who are actually over 18.

Yes, which suggests he wasn't actually looking for girls that look younger.
Instead he got a 17 year old's naked selfies. she probably looked like a full grown adult.

oh... and I just checked... it was explicitly in rhode island whose age of consent is 16
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States#Rhode_Island

meaning it was perfectly legal for him to fuck this 17 year old. but the moment she sent him a naked selfie it became child porn.
which makes the whole thing even more bizzare