The next big minority

[The Phule]

So, something I’ve noticed is that, as debate seems to settle around one minority, another one is pulled out of obscurity to debate about.

For example, most recently transsexuals were pulled out of obscurity to be the subject of new rules and recognition as a strange new centerpiece to the endless debate between American rights and American left.

I’m frankly wondering who’s next? Will Furries fight to achieve recognition by law? Unlikely. Will BDSM relationships try to be legally recognized? I think that conventional marriage covers many forms of that. What about plural marriage?

Will it be our old fight and common blame magnets the Jews? New comments from many right wing sources seem to imply growing distrust and mainstream acceptance of antisemeticisim. But this is coming from both the left and the right… as is support of Jews. Particularly feeling last towards Israel are complex to say the least.

no, I think that the next group that will be bright to light by our political system as part of its bread abs circuses program is ‘plurals’. I’ve been seeing signs that they’re becoming more prominent, especially on media produced by artists and writers of the left. They’re gradually growing in prominence, and likely will soon either be attacked by the right, or aggressively waved like a banner by the left until the right is baited into attacking them.

and then the whole game begins again and politicians on both sides start focusing on plurals instead of the things that really matter to either side.

 

[gral]

WTF are 'plurals'?

 

[The Phule]

WTF are 'plurals'?

https://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/threads/plural-and-dissociative-identities-community-thread.63081/

This. It seems beautifully designed to both outrage the right and provoke sympathy in the left.

couldn’t get more perfect for that purpose of you tried, I almost feel like the whole thing is being astroturfed… manufactured to drive the outrage economy.

people who claim to believe that they have multiple people living in their head as head mates.

in truth, humans are not a cohesive whole,we just identify as such, we are many independent systems operating together. These people seem to think that makes them special, or try to personify their, say, hangry personality or treat their net persona as a separate person.

fucking weird.

 

[Zachowon]

Isn't that Schizophrenia?

And I think Pedos will be next actually

 

[Cherico]

Isn't that Schizophrenia?

And I think Pedos will be next actually

all signs point to yes.

 

[Zachowon]

all signs point to yes.

Oh for sure

 

[Cherico]

Oh for sure

Im just wondering if thats going to be the thing where the black community finally has enough and the majority ditches the democrats.

Every one is going to hit their limit sooner or later because these assholes are just that obnoxious, its just a matter of time and where your lines are.

 

[Zachowon]

Im just wondering if thats going to be the thing where the black community finally has enough and the majority ditches the democrats.

Every one is going to hit their limit sooner or later because these assholes are just that obnoxious, its just a matter of time and where your lines are.

I think a vast majority will hit there limit then

 

[LindyAF]

Im just wondering if thats going to be the thing where the black community finally has enough and the majority ditches the democrats.

Every one is going to hit their limit sooner or later because these assholes are just that obnoxious, its just a matter of time and where your lines are.

Literally never going to happen. This is a fantasy held by people who buy into progressive morality and want magic black people around so they can have a defense against accusations of "racism."

Republicans might be able to peel off or at least get hispanics and asians voting closer to neutrally, essentially by exploiting natural racial division and painting the democrats as the party of black racial interest rather than the party of diversity coalition interest. But blaxit is a total fantasy that's only peddled by grifters.

 

[LindyAF]

On LGBT stuff, as I said in another thread IMO it's going to be "polyamory" and "poly" people. It's anti-social, destructive, and disgusting, but already isn't seen as so in leftist circles. You see this sort of stuff already fairly accepted in left-wing spaces and far-left cities. Won't start with marriage but rather with "acceptance," anti-discrimination stuff. Will probably eventually include "marriage" as well but that's further down the line.

Like, as an obvious rule of thumb, to see what the other side is going to move on next think about what they already support or is already totally accepted among the harder left, rather than what is mostly confined to novelty takes and "irony."

My understanding is that "multiple personality disorder" or "dissociative identity disorder" is generally regarded as bullshit by the psychologists and psychiatrists right now. These fields skew way left so if that was on the horizon they'd be walking that stuff back well in advance, like they did for sodomy and trannies. I also haven't seen any of this.

 

[Zachowon]

On LGBT stuff, as I said in another thread IMO it's going to be "polyamory" and "poly" people. It's anti-social, destructive, and disgusting, but already isn't seen as so in leftist circles. You see this sort of stuff already fairly accepted in left-wing spaces and far-left cities. Won't start with marriage but rather with "acceptance," anti-discrimination stuff. Will probably eventually include "marriage" as well but that's further down the line.

Like, as an obvious rule of thumb, to see what the other side is going to move on next think about what they already support or is already totally accepted among the harder left, rather than what is mostly confined to novelty takes and "irony."

My understanding is that "multiple personality disorder" or "dissociative identity disorder" is generally regarded as bullshit by the psychologists and psychiatrists right now. These fields skew way left so if that was on the horizon they'd be walking that stuff back well in advance, like they did for sodomy and trannies. I also haven't seen any of this.

I think they are real, but not something like they are generally portrayed. More along the lines of the movie Voices with Ryan Reynolds. A sign of szicophrenia or insanity more then something that should be accepted

 

[bintananth]

On LGBT stuff, as I said in another thread IMO it's going to be "polyamory" and "poly" people. It's anti-social, destructive, and disgusting, but already isn't seen as so in leftist circles. You see this sort of stuff already fairly accepted in left-wing spaces and far-left cities. Won't start with marriage but rather with "acceptance," anti-discrimination stuff. Will probably eventually include "marriage" as well but that's further down the line.

On the marriage front I doubt "poly" is going to be allowed anytime soon. Allowing someone to have multiple spouses would turn into a contractual quagmire when the inevitable disagreements start. Much more so than sorting out a divorce or a bunch of squabbling heirs fighting over the terms of a will.

On the marriage front I suspect the next fight will be getting all the states on the same page in terms of how closely related the happy couple can be.

Right now I think 19 states allow 1st cousins to marry and 24 states prohibit those marriages with the remainder saying "only under certain circumstances". That's similar to how it was with gay marriage before SCOTUS stepped in.

 

[Zachowon]

On the marriage front I doubt "poly" is going to be allowed anytime soon. Allowing someone to have multiple spouses would turn into a contractual quagmire when the inevitable disagreements start. Much more so than sorting out a divorce or a bunch of squabbling heirs fighting over the terms of a will.

On the marriage front I suspect the next fight will be getting all the states on the same page in terms of how closely related the happy couple can be.

Right now I think 19 states allow 1st cousins to marry and 24 states prohibit those marriages with the remainder saying "only under certain circumstances". That's similar to how it was with gay marriage before SCOTUS stepped in.

I still think age is the next fight

 

[bintananth]

I still think age is the next fight

In what way?

 

[Zachowon]

In what way?

Allowing the age of consent to either be lowered, or gotten rid of

 

[LordsFire]

In what way?

Open support of pedophilia. The left has already started to do this, ala 'Desmond is Amazing' and similar things.

It also fits the bill of 'things conservatives will never, ever support' so they can use it as a cultural flail against us.

 

[Zachowon]

Open support of pedophilia. The left has already started to do this, ala 'Desmond is Amazing' and similar things.

It also fits the bill of 'things conservatives will never, ever support' so they can use it as a cultural flail against us.

It is one of the few that a large majority will not agree on

 

[bintananth]

Allowing the age of consent to either be lowered, or gotten rid of

That's something the overwhelming majority of the population regardless of where they are on the political spectrum isn't going to tolerate.

 

[Zachowon]

That's something the overwhelming majority of the population regardless of where they are on the political spectrum isn't going to tolerate.

Maybe centrists and those to the right. It is a growing ideal in the left. Hell, a law in Cali was iirc brought up about changing it or getting rid of it. One of the cities involving sex offenders or something Cant reemeber

 

[Abhorsen]

There won't be a next minority, or at least not a new one. We can see it already. The democrat civil rights machine was built on civil rights, and was very powerful because of that. But they ran out of actual civil rights with Obergfell (discrimination in law) or Bostock (discrimination by companies), depending on your opinion on how rights work. And now we see the collapse as the Democrats are frantically looking for a new cause to call the Republicans evil, but they ran out. So now they are throwing everything at the wall in hopes something sticks. Riots, pedos, blacks, illegal immigrants, the 'coup', and I could go on. But it isn't working that well, and the hits aren't sticking.

The actual next minority? Probably gun owners. They are primed to start winning legal rights in states where they aren't popular through lawsuits, just like all the other ones did. They just had a huge surge in first time gun owners as well.

Regardless, welcome to the other side. Learn the tactics the Democrats used, and use them back at them. We already stole sanctuary cities, let's see what other ideas we can use.