Should The U.S withdraw its tendrils from the world and focus only on its neighborhood (North America and northern South America
- Thread starter Zacharguy
- Start date
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
For all that one can complain about American imperialism, it is far more benevolent than a Russian or Chinese led world order.
Ask the poles how they feel about being ruled by Russia some time...
seriously Russians were massive dicks to the people they lorded over and still are.
Shadepen97
Well-known member
Aren't the Russians saber rattling about taking back former soviet territories? Citing the possible second US civil war?
Most of our tendrils. Japan & Korea need to keep getting tentacle raped for the sake of Anime & K-Pop.
almostinsane
Well-known member
You somehow made a convincing argument that tentacle porn is a net good.
Bravo.
It's a talent.
Taiwan, Japan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia among others would pursue the peaceful development and deployment of nuclear weapons, undoubtedly leading to a far brighter future.
Every damn person who served in the Middle East knows why Saudi Arabia wants Nuclear Weapons. And it ain't for benevolence.
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
The way I see the arms proliferation going-the Saudis would get them from Pakistan. That is if Iran got them first and Israel didn't nuke them.
After that, I can see Egypt getting them-they have the resources and money, and withdrawing from the NPT would not be much trouble for Sisi, Turkey would be getting nukes at the same time.
Jordan and the other Gulf Monarchies would rely on the Saudi umbrella; Syria, Iraq, and Libya and Yemen are devastated war torn shitholes(well Iraq isn't as much these days but yeah its still a screwed up place), and so would not have any money or resources to devote to nukes(not that say Bashar wouldn't at least look into it). Lebanon is coming apart at the seams, and the Israelis would respond very harshly if they tried to get them.
Sudan-is too poor and now with the country's future an open question I don't see them trying for them.
After that, I can see Egypt getting them-they have the resources and money, and withdrawing from the NPT would not be much trouble for Sisi, Turkey would be getting nukes at the same time.
Jordan and the other Gulf Monarchies would rely on the Saudi umbrella; Syria, Iraq, and Libya and Yemen are devastated war torn shitholes(well Iraq isn't as much these days but yeah its still a screwed up place), and so would not have any money or resources to devote to nukes(not that say Bashar wouldn't at least look into it). Lebanon is coming apart at the seams, and the Israelis would respond very harshly if they tried to get them.
Sudan-is too poor and now with the country's future an open question I don't see them trying for them.
D
Deleted member
Guest
While I have no interest in mainland Afro-Eurasia, keeping the Chinese out of Insular East Asia and Oceania is something I support a powerful fleet for.
Every damn person who served in the Middle East knows why Saudi Arabia wants Nuclear Weapons. And it ain't for benevolence.
I refuse to add smilies to all of my deadpan sarcasm.
To make their own Godzilla?
Every damn person who served in the Middle East knows why Saudi Arabia wants Nuclear Weapons. And it ain't for benevolence.