Russia(gate/bot) Post your favorite tankie/authoritarian moonbat

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
hacbzzz.jpg


I can understand tankies supporting China against the Hong Kong protesters, since that's kind of their thing, but hating on the Kurds?
Hold on, isn't stonetoss that far-right cartoonist? I thought he'd cheer on the Hong Kong protestors for going against commies.
 

gral

Well-known member
Ideologues are not known for their intelligence or ability to reason.

Oh, some of them are intelligent and are able to reason. It's just that being these things doesn't help their argument, so they hide it.
 

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
I can understand tankies supporting China against the Hong Kong protesters, since that's kind of their thing, but hating on the Kurds?
Hold on, isn't stonetoss that far-right cartoonist? I thought he'd cheer on the Hong Kong protestors for going against commies.

I'm guessing that his real point is his lack of concern for the things that some other people are very concerned about.
So no, he doesn't hate the Kurds - he simply refuses to care about them.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
The WSWS. They come so close to defending outright pedophilia sometimes.

I read their political and economic articles because they are fairly refreshing(their orthodox Marxists and so usually have something at least semi insightful to say), wherein their defense of Polanski is political, they seem to not really see anything fundamentally wrong with what he did.

Not that they would ever admit that.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
The WSWS. They come so close to defending outright pedophilia sometimes.

I read their political and economic articles because they are fairly refreshing(their orthodox Marxists and so usually have something at least semi insightful to say), wherein their defense of Polanski is political, they seem to not really see anything fundamentally wrong with what he did.

Not that they would ever admit that.
Let's not give them any more credit than they deserve here; the people defending Polanski are not just defending a pedophile, they're defending a child rapist. Roman Polanski isn't in trouble because they caught him in possession of child porn, or something like that; he drugged a 13-year-old girl, and then had sex with her. There is no defending that, period.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
Let's not give them any more credit than they deserve here; the people defending Polanski are not just defending a pedophile, they're defending a child rapist. Roman Polanski isn't in trouble because they caught him in possession of child porn, or something like that; he drugged a 13-year-old girl, and then had sex with her. There is no defending that, period.
They basically like him, because he does films that suit their Trotskyite artistic pretensions of opposition to state and society. But fundamentally I do not believe they see his actions as really bad.

Being as they are Trots, and you know orthodox marxists. Sexual crimes are in their view-small matters. Not that they would ever admit, "we don't think child rape is really bad", they just kind of half insinuate it, and say its the USG is persecuting him because...he criticizes society in a way they like?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top