Post-update bug reports

[The One Char]

Click envelope icon above.
Click start new conversation.
Type recipient name in the appropriate field.

Spam.

Honestly, writing messages to people on their profiles has always been a stupid design decision, however the one problem we might have is that there is a number of conversations limit and participants number limit.

That is a long standing problem here and I am geussing a xenforo configuration.
Or for all I know it is another stupid bug no one reported.

@LordSunhawk mind letting us have more than 5 e-mail chains going on?

I'm tired of seeing someone post stupid takes and I want to block them.

 

[49ersfootball]

We are currently experiencing a backend server issue involving the approval queue. This is being worked on. In addition, we think we've solved the issue with subforum bans to some of the newer subforums resulting in multiple bans rather than solely the subforum in question.

Xenforo 2 is a cast-iron bitch to work with, but it's still better than the alternatives. Please pardon the dust as we try to get things behaving themselves.

I tried getting on earlier this afternoon. It went haywire. Is there some reason why folks haven't been able to get on Sietch ?

 

[Agent23]

I'm tired of seeing someone post stupid takes and I want to block them.

Maybe if you ask nicely they can do that manually for you.

Or maybe they can just disable all the stupid addons that apparently break what must be core functionality.

In the meantime, you are welcome to use my custom greasemonkey add-on if you want.

 

[SietchTechOps]

2) You use some kind of VPS, I think a digital ocean one, just clone it and spin up a test instance to check if everything is working alright.

Sunhawk literally said we do that in the very post you responded to. The problem is that a lot of these issues only appear under load, and because they're *glitches* rather than incompatibilities per se, you get problems with X feature that are due to add-ons that shouldn't have anything to do with X feature, but indirectly interact with it in some obscure way in the back end.

 

[Agent23]

Sunhawk literally said we do that in the very post you responded to. The problem is that a lot of these issues only appear under load, and because they're *glitches* rather than incompatibilities per se, you get problems with X feature that are due to add-ons that shouldn't have anything to do with X feature, but indirectly interact with it in some obscure way in the back end.

You do realize there is such a thing as load testing, right?