Yes, they do. I know some personally. As I said, three siblings, and only one of them looks Native, while the others look entirely white. They all meet blood quantum requirements and are registered member of a tribe. Are you denying their existence just because you have a hate boner for Sargon?No, no they don't.
Or she just didn't like him putting it out there like that. This also doesn't disprove him getting assaulted.Then why didn't he mention it in his interview? During the interview, he was pressed on the point of how harmful his comments were to rape victims. He claimed that ONE person, whose name he would not provide, had messaged him and thanked him for his rape jokes. He was so cavalier about throwing his wife out there before, when heckled on the street, why not talk about how his wife was raped? And how his rape jokes had helped her? Instead, he doesn't mention his wife at all.
It's almost as if he flat out lied about his wife being raped when he was being heckled, because he thought no one had noticed. And when he was pressed by the interviewer, he claimed sexual assault. Did not expand upon what had happened to him to qualify as sexual assault, but claimed it nonetheless. No matter which way you slice it, if his wife had been raped, supported him, and his behavior--then he would have brought it up in the BBC interview.
I guess I feel pretty indifferently toward it and don't really care if some con-man got doxxed. That makes Sargon a bit of a hypocrite, but hardly the horrible person you make him out to be.Some alt-right conman. He'd been involved with a deal or business venture that had gone bad. Sargon had taken his dox from kiwi farms and put it up in a video. And look, if Sargon had a change or heart, that's fine. The problem is with Sargon is that he kept insisting that he wasn't for doxing and at the same time--let Kraut get tarred and feathered for having a doxing server. Let him take the entire fall all on his own.
If Sargon had a change of heart, that's one thing. If he felt exceptions should be made, that's also one thing. But he was trying to play to the Skeptic crowd and his own past complaints about being doxed.
Indeed.Wait, hold on.
It's not a joke you would have made. So you agree that it was a joke made in poor taste, right?
No it wouldn't. If anything it would have gotten worse because then he would be admitting to it and they would have what amounted to a confession to point at. I really don't blame him for not giving them the satisfaction. It would have been better had he not made the joke at all, but he did.So why couldn't Carl Benjamin just say that it was in poor taste and that in hindsight, it was immature and doesn't represent himself or his campaign? Because that would have blunted the damage. It would never fully go away, but it would have kept the media from using it to repeatedly attack him or his party.
He did? If so, I guess we can see how well that helped him, considering people were still accusing him of sexual assault because of it.Donald Trump knew better. Even he apologized for his "Grab them by the pussy" comment.
They would have done so anyway, even if they didn't have the joke to point at.If Carl had simply made the same excuse, he would have fared much better. Instead, he didn't apologize and the media was able to paint him as a remorseless psychopath who hated women.
Am I now?But that's not the only morality. In fact, it is the minority. The other large, but minority moral group is Libertarian. Libertarians are generally very high in Liberty, but very low in almost all other things.
The horror.They care most primarily about their personal freedom.
Well, yeah, you got that part right. It's hardly my only concern, though.Almost any intent on limiting that freedom is deemed as a great evil.
Well at least you admit that they're extremists. The number one thing I see is the claim that we're all anarchists, because wanting to limit government equates to not wanting any government, apparently.An extreme example is Sovereign Citizens, who go to great extents to skirt or disobey the law. Turning a traffic ticket into serious prison time because they refuse to pay their fines or provide their information or whatever. But Libertarians are actually really good at cutting through red tape where it doesn't make any sense.
Personal experience tells me otherwise. At times I kind of feel like I'm the only one who remembers the first few years of the current century.And then there are Conservatives. Conservatives are relatively balanced in all areas of morality.
In any case, I'm not really go into it too much. I'm actually already aware of it as this is one of the things you tend to bring up a lot.
I guess I assumed he meant stuff like doxxing or using something like cancel culture to apply pressure to companies. That actually kind of worked during GamerGate until people seemingly got bored and stopped bothering. But this is undoubtedly part of the reason why the leftists still bring up GamerGate as their great satan.Now, I know that's sort of a TLDR moment, but try to stick with me. What Sargon suggested to the Alt-Right wouldn't work because the Alt-Right aren't liberals. They aren't high in caring. So anything the Alt-Right thought leaders tried with SJW tactics wouldn't work because their own support base wouldn't care, because it does not strongly violate their own morality. In fact, as there is a high likelyhood that many Alt-Right are low in caring, it would actively turn off their audience. Which is why MillennialWoes was mostly just confused at the suggestion.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but aren't you one of the Never-Trumpers who is just ignoring all the evidence of election fraud and actually does see the 1/6 Capital protest as an attempted insurrection and all that? And of course there's that morality point stuff you discussed above.Could you be more specific?
I have to admit, I kind of felt the same way back when he was still the Internet Aristocrat only to run away later on, and is why I don't really hold him in high regard. But I understand him a bit better now, and frankly this is why I don't think all that much of him.*Frankly, that Sargon thought of Metokur as some sort of internet activist. Metokur basically jumpstarted Gamergate. And Sargon and others within the Skeptic group always held him up as a sort of leader. And Sargon even accused Metokur of running away from his responsibilities. And Sargon felt that Metokur was swinging on over to become Alt-Right. In reality, Metokur has always just been an internet troll.