United States NPR Now Has A Chief Diversity Officer

DarthOne

☦️

Keith Woods Named NPR's Chief Diversity Officer
Thursday, January 23; Washington, D.C. — NPR CEO John Lansing announced today that Keith Woods, currently Vice President of Newsroom Training and Diversity, has been promoted to the newly created position of Chief Diversity Officer. As a part of the executive leadership team, Woods will guide NPR's push to expand the diversity of its audience work across NPR and help build a more diverse and inclusive organization.
"I want NPR to reflect diversity, equity, and inclusion in everything we do. As an organization we should be leaders in providing news and cultural programming that speaks to our richly diverse country and connects with an audience that looks and sounds like America – all while creating a welcoming and supportive workplace for all," said Lansing. "To elevate and expand the role of diversity in our thinking and in our work, I am promoting Keith Woods to Chief Diversity Officer. Given his decade of service to NPR, working to strengthen our newsroom and the public radio system, he is ideally suited for this role. Keith will be a thought partner to me and the rest of the executive team, helping us set goals and craft a diversity plan that is responsive to – and accountable to – our staff and the public we serve."
"I'm excited to work with John and my colleagues on these issues and truly focus NPR's attention on bringing more of the public to public radio," said Woods. "We know it will mean hearing more voices from across the country, building and strengthening the diversity of our staff, and reaching out more deliberately in all that we do to embrace audiences who don't yet know who we are or don't yet believe that their stories are our stories."
Woods will report directly to the CEO and continue his leadership and advising roles in key areas, and his team will grow to support that work. He will maintain his position as head of the editorial training unit, lead key diversity initiatives in the newsroom with Senior Vice President Nancy Barnes, advise and support Programming & Audience Development Senior Vice President Anya Grundmann in her diversity efforts, and build on the collaborative work he's done with Chief Human Resources Officer Carrie Storer as she and her team work to strengthen our workplace through training, staff development, recruitment, and employee relations.
Woods came to NPR in 2010 to lead the organization's diversity strategy and has worked with the newsroom on a multi-year effort to increase the diversity of sources. He has trained the staffs of more than 30 public media stations from Canton, New York, to Juneau, Alaska. Before joining NPR, Woods was Dean of Faculty of The Poynter Institute, a school for journalists in St. Petersburg, Florida. He is co-author of The Authentic Voice: The Best Reporting on Race and Ethnicity. While at Poynter, he chaired two Pulitzer Prize juries. He is a native of New Orleans and a graduate of Dillard University and the Tulane University School of Social Work. He is a former sports writer, news reporter, city editor, editorial writer and columnist, working his way through those jobs in 16 years at the New Orleans Times-Picayune.
As if they weren’t unbearable to listen to before with the hour-long reports about how ‘Drumpf is finished any day now!’ and how ‘most Americans support impeachment!’ They and the BBC need to stop stealing people’s tax dollars for the sake of spewing bullshit.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
NPR is perfectly capable of surviving with out our tax dollars and should do so.
PBS is in the same boat.

I don’t think the Business Democrats are gonna wake up from this ideological bubble that will screw em over in both short and long runs

Too much bureaucracy is a problem not just for governments but also for businesses
 

Cherico

Well-known member
I don’t think the Business Democrats are gonna wake up from this ideological bubble that will screw em over in both short and long runs

Too much bureaucracy is a problem not just for governments but also for businesses




we are going through a political realignment, the republicans collapsed and rebuilt themselves first.

The democrats are going through that process now, business democrats are trying to keep a sinking ship afloat but if they lose 2020 the knives come out.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag


we are going through a political realignment, the republicans collapsed and rebuilt themselves first.

The democrats are going through that process now, business democrats are trying to keep a sinking ship afloat but if they lose 2020 the knives come out.


How will the celebrities and creators deal with it though?

Plenty are rather outspoken and very active in social media and are promoted heavily
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
The democrats problem is that their base is now far more leftist than the leadership.

And thus the old democratic coalition can't hold-the old democrats of the 1990s and even 2000s, can't hope to keep ahead of the leftward movement of their base.

And they also have to worry about appeasing Wall Street and Silicon Valley-which they take a lot of money from by the way.

And that creates a problem, especially for democrats who try to play both ends against the middle.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
It has, its also declining. Turns out the luster of apple and Microsoft isn't as great coin as it used to be.

But you know what they don't like? Democrats that promise to tax them 95%.
Errr... Microsoft has been doing quite well overall. Their stocks have generally been up over the last five years and they're generally considered a safe investment.

But then, Microsoft ain't located in the Silicon Valley and as such is some ways inured to their influence. In fact, if I had to guess, I'd bet a lot of Silicon Valley types hate Microsoft due to their dominance of OS and making profits from OS, which a lot of Silicon Valley types prefer open source Linux models.

As I've noted before, while Microsoft is decidedly a Liberal company, I'm not sure they're quite so Progressive. Remember: Microsoft grew up in, and is still based in, Redmont Washington near Seattle. While Seattle is quite liberal and progressive, the technology industry in the region was built up by and maintained by a very different set up industries than what grew silicon valley: Aerospace corporations. If there's one thing that Aerospace corporations like it's the US military, and that attitude also tends to influence other industries based in Washington State. They might be Liberal, they may even like Big Government and Big Government spending, but they tend to be a bit more patriotic and pro-American than businesses located in Silicon Valley.

You can see this attitude play out directly in what contracts they compete for. Google, a Silicon Valley corporation, has gone on record as stating they will not take contracts with the US Military because of "morals" (meanwhile they'll go out of their way to help the Chinese government create some of the most Orwellian computer systems we've yet seen). Meanwhile Microsoft and Amazon are having a MASSIVE legal feud over who gets the US Military's "JEDI" contract to provide Cloud Services to the US Military, and Microsoft basically HATES China (because they keep stealing Windows), oh, and Amazon ain't fond of them either, since China's government directly supports Alibaba, the Chinese equivalent to Amazon, and basically refuses them entry into the Chinese market.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Its one thing to have a twitter mob call you racist, its different to have a socialist legislator demand you pay 98% taxes annually.

Not a concern to the WOKE AF employees who were hired and remains hired(were around before) due to their political views and oppression olympics winnings
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
Not a concern to the WOKE AF employees who were hired and remains hired(were around before) due to their political views and oppression olympics winnings
They'll do as they're told because fundementally they are cowards. Plus it's not going to be hard to find or fake. Some tweet ir video or whatever. That will easily psint the dissenters as "Nazis" or "problematic". Then the mob turns on them conviently solving the issue.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
They'll do as they're told because fundementally they are cowards. Plus it's not going to be hard to find or fake. Some tweet ir video or whatever. That will easily psint the dissenters as "Nazis" or "problematic". Then the mob turns on them conviently solving the issue.

Calling them “Nazis” or “problematic” as a means of silencing them implies the SJW crowd us still in control

The real issue maybe finding good enough replacements

Ones that are very good as well

Some industries were already dying though or don’t look to havr much ambition and optimism left anyway like comics
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Calling them “Nazis” or “problematic” as a means of silencing them implies the SJW crowd us still in control

The real issue maybe finding good enough replacements

Ones that are very good as well

Some industries were already dying though or don’t look to havr much ambition and optimism left anyway like comics

The comics industry will survive its just going indi in a more major way.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
The comics industry will survive its just going indi in a more major way.

Even the past Indie Comicbook Industries went SJW and regularly are rather cheap

With great, detailed and pretty sexy covers, lackluster interior artwork by different artists

But yeah, the way to survive isn’t through the mainstream or major industry

It’s like choosing to live in small boats that can slowly be built up to be bigger instead of titanics and sub-titanics that keep insisting on heading through giant icebergs
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top