ISOT Australia and New Zealand and Cape Colony from 1820 to 1620

raharris1973

Well-known member
What if Australia and New Zealand and the British controlled Cape Colony of the year 1820 are all ISOT back to the year 1620?

This back timing places these small settlement two hundred years prior, severing from their regular external trade connections. In fact, New Zealand lacks for European settlements, it is divided among Maori chiefdoms, and probably intermittently just has a population or 100 or 200 Europeans or Americans, whalers, fishermen, merchants, missionaries, at any given time.

The Cape Colony have a Cape Boer population in Capetown, a British garrison, some British administrators and merchants, Coloreds, Cape Malays, rural Boer farmers and pastoralists, and Hottentot and Bantu groups.

The Australian continent has a population of at least a quarter million to a million aborigines, and 20 to 30 thousand Europeans.

All have local agriculture and game and literate administrators and workshops, but none are developed with very large scale factories or mines. They exploit local natural resources, but import non-craft manufactured goods, and have not seen a steamship nor a railroad. Some of the ships in port, and cannon and small arms in possession of the local garrisons at the Cape and in Australia, are naturally state of the art tech by 1620s standards, but they lack local mass production capabilities.

These areas now find themselves in the world of the 1620s, the Indian and southern oceans at this time are much more frequently travelled by the Portuguese subjects of the Spanish crown - At this time Philip III, for 1 more year, before Philip IV takes over, and merchants of the rebellious Dutch United Provinces, led by Maurice of Orange, than by Englishmen, but some of the latter do come around, along with some Frenchmen.

King James I of England & Scotland rules England, Scotland, and Ireland and will continue to do so until his death in 1625. Under him, England has finally had success in colonial endeavors on the North American coast and the Caribbean, notably at Virginia, Bermuda, and Plymouth.

When will these uptime antipodal lands make contact with uptime people, particularly Europeans and Englishmen? How will they interact? Will Australia and the Cape Colony reaffiliate with the downtime Stuart England of James I and Charles I, because of their small size and vulnerability? Or evolve independently, because of cultural and political differences from being from a different time of origin? What 'news from the future' will uptimer antipodeans share, and what technical knowledge will these relatively backward, but certainly not ignorant, communities, impart to the downtime world of the 1620s?

Where do you see things headed over the next 100 years with this point of departure?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP
It strikes me that no matter what direction or political affiliation things take, a European world knowledgeable about the Cape, Australia, and New Zealand geography from this early date will significantly alter history and trade. If the antipodes never politically reaffiliate or affiliate with Europe, they will likely still trade with Europe, and Asia, and likely in time have growing populations, and also eventually attract immigration from Europe.

If they do reaffiliate with Europe, more likely England than anyone else, England simultaneously having South African and Australian colonies to develop, while its North American colonies are being founded, with an option over the next century to begin colonization in New Zealand, will be a very differently developing English/British Empire, with an increasingly broad and numerous 'Anglosphere'.
 
It strikes me that no matter what direction or political affiliation things take, a European world knowledgeable about the Cape, Australia, and New Zealand geography from this early date will significantly alter history and trade. If the antipodes never politically reaffiliate or affiliate with Europe, they will likely still trade with Europe, and Asia, and likely in time have growing populations, and also eventually attract immigration from Europe.

If they do reaffiliate with Europe, more likely England than anyone else, England simultaneously having South African and Australian colonies to develop, while its North American colonies are being founded, with an option over the next century to begin colonization in New Zealand, will be a very differently developing English/British Empire, with an increasingly broad and numerous 'Anglosphere'.
Two possibilities:
1.They try to remain alone there - England could remain in Stuart hands here,becouse those opposing them would run there.
And,they,after 100 years,start colonize pacyfic shore of North America.

2.They join England - Stuarts fall or not,but England would rule waves earlier,and take more colonies.Probably all spice islands from dutch.
Europe - maybe somebody would be smart enough to crush prussians when they are still weak,maybe polish nobles get smart and agree to standing army.
Not plausible,they were stupid.
 
The Cape naturally reverts to beeing Die Kaap ASAP. England is too weak and poor to enforce "ownership". The Afrikaners kick out the garrison and establish some sort of modus vivendi with the VOC. They do not want the VOC to rule - they know how bad it is at it, but a protectorate could be arranged, I suppose. Especially if it carried low cost for the VOC ...

Heck, with no money coming from London, much of the garrison (practically the only Brits there) could "go native" i.e. integrate into the Afrikaner community. Some would hire themselves out to the VOC/other employers, true, while I imagine many simply walking away from their barracs and going into farming or trades.

I'd venture some 40k whites and mulattos there in 1820 - that means 400-600k (they double every 20-25 years) by the end of the century. That's WITHOUT immigration.

I do not know enough about Australia to comment. But the British there could "go native", which here would mean a self ruling entity, with some ties to England - maybe the EIC or even the VOC. But unlike Die Kaap the chances for integration with England (no Britain yet, remeber?) are high, almost a certainty.

World (European and related) history is different from OTL inside a year or two, naturally. After 100 years? Unrecogniseable ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ATP
It strikes me that no matter what direction or political affiliation things take, a European world knowledgeable about the Cape, Australia, and New Zealand geography from this early date will significantly alter history and trade. If the antipodes never politically reaffiliate or affiliate with Europe, they will likely still trade with Europe, and Asia, and likely in time have growing populations, and also eventually attract immigration from Europe.

If they do reaffiliate with Europe, more likely England than anyone else, England simultaneously having South African and Australian colonies to develop, while its North American colonies are being founded, with an option over the next century to begin colonization in New Zealand, will be a very differently developing English/British Empire, with an increasingly broad and numerous 'Anglosphere'.
I would add one catholic colony,too - otherwise,knowledge could be used only by protestants.
No matter which one.Maybe Timor owned by Portugal Kingdom?
 
knowledge could be used only by protestants.
Oh, Catholic KGB torture protestants for knowledge, no problem :)
Also, souless greedy Prots sell secrets to the Inquisition for 30 pieces of silver ... take your pick :D

Timor is a shithole with the parish priest - sent there as punishment - passing as the intelgentsia. If you want some knowledge - I'd suggest Goa or Macau.
Or La Plata - there is an university there, IIRC.
Phillipines?
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: ATP
Oh, Catholic KGB torture protestants for knowledge, no problem :)
Also, souless greedy Prots sell secrets to the Inquisition for 30 pieces of silver ... take your pick :D

Timor is a shithole with the parish priest - sent there as punishment - passing as the intelgentsia. If you want some knowledge - I'd suggest Goa or Macau.
Or La Plata - there is an university there, IIRC.
Phillipines?
you knew,that Inquisition practically do not used tortures?
But,you are right,Goa would be much better.
 
Or La Plata - there is an university there, IIRC.
By 1620? Buenos Aires was built and destroyed and rebuilt one or two times. But certainly Asuncion had at least an escuela, maybe in 1620, still Jesuit run. They should be pretty smarty-pants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP
you knew,that Inquisition practically do not used tortures?
I was pandering to the "Evul! Catholic Inquisition torture you to death if you don't eat your spinach"crowd :p
By 1620? Buenos Aires was built and destroyed and rebuilt one or two times. But certainly Asuncion had at least an escuela, maybe in 1620, still Jesuit run. They should be pretty smarty-pants.
Who said anything about that disgusting (it gave us Diego Maradona, yuck!) place?!? The uni is in Cordoba! Since 1613!
 
I would add one catholic colony,too - otherwise,knowledge could be used only by protestants.
No matter which one.Maybe Timor owned by Portugal Kingdom?
There's probably some Irishmen they caught and sent to Australia who learnt some things. And they're not all illiterate, and some may have an enterprising and rebellious enough nature and ability with other languages to share uptime knowledge with other Catholics. It may be an overestimate, but there is a saying that "an Australian is just an Irishman who got caught". Sure, Australia is majority Protestant, probably even today, and it probably took awhile for individual Catholics to band together and pool together the money to start actual churches, but Australia almost certainly had a number of Catholics, Irish and from the English and Scottish Catholic minorities, from pretty much the beginning of white settlement.

I do not know enough about Australia to comment. But the British there could "go native", which here would mean a self ruling entity, with some ties to England - maybe the EIC or even the VOC. But unlike Die Kaap the chances for integration with England (no Britain yet, remeber?) are high, almost a certainty.

Well, given Australia's head start with a founder population in 1620, but good soil and available land for farming and just enough trading to fill gaps, the Australian population, economy, and navy can go to quite impressive proportions by 1800 and the start of the OTL Napoleonic Wars. All the more so in a time of assumed busy European powers, and sleepy, not yet industrializing, not expanding, not outwardly looking native Asian states. A growing independent Australia has potential to be a USA or UK like power equivalent in the Pacific & Indian Ocean regions by the 19th century. If still attached at the hip with England/Britain in union, then it is a massive power projector into those areas and source of global support for Britain.
 
There's probably some Irishmen they caught and sent to Australia who learnt some things. And they're not all illiterate, and some may have an enterprising and rebellious enough nature and ability with other languages to share uptime knowledge with other Catholics. It may be an overestimate, but there is a saying that "an Australian is just an Irishman who got caught". Sure, Australia is majority Protestant, probably even today, and it probably took awhile for individual Catholics to band together and pool together the money to start actual churches, but Australia almost certainly had a number of Catholics, Irish and from the English and Scottish Catholic minorities, from pretty much the beginning of white settlement.



Well, given Australia's head start with a founder population in 1620, but good soil and available land for farming and just enough trading to fill gaps, the Australian population, economy, and navy can go to quite impressive proportions by 1800 and the start of the OTL Napoleonic Wars. All the more so in a time of assumed busy European powers, and sleepy, not yet industrializing, not expanding, not outwardly looking native Asian states. A growing independent Australia has potential to be a USA or UK like power equivalent in the Pacific & Indian Ocean regions by the 19th century. If still attached at the hip with England/Britain in union, then it is a massive power projector into those areas and source of global support for Britain.
1.Not the same as catholic colony,becouse they could send technology and future knowledge to their rulers in 1620.
2.True.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top