LindyAF
Well-known member
tbh most of the hypothetical people who it's being proposed shouldn't have a gun is the sort of thing that's taken care of by like... people using basic common sense, a right to refuse service for any reason or none, and a high trust society.
Most of the hypothetical people being mentioned are not going to be able to get a gun (legally) easily on their own right now. For starters you've got to be able to either drive to the your LGS or research the parts you need to order and manufacture the gun yourself, which (almost?) always requires machining as well.
If someone is not mentally or physically competent to live on their own without assistance, they are essentially precluded from owning a gun, barring the case where those close to them believe they should own one and are willing to offer assistance to make that happen- in which case they presumably have a good enough knowledge of the person to make a determination themselves.
Most of the hypothetical people being mentioned are not going to be able to get a gun (legally) easily on their own right now. For starters you've got to be able to either drive to the your LGS or research the parts you need to order and manufacture the gun yourself, which (almost?) always requires machining as well.
If someone is not mentally or physically competent to live on their own without assistance, they are essentially precluded from owning a gun, barring the case where those close to them believe they should own one and are willing to offer assistance to make that happen- in which case they presumably have a good enough knowledge of the person to make a determination themselves.