Five minutes of hate news

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
EWO-DJ0UMAAT18G.jpg


EWO-DXcVcAACiJn.jpg


Leaving live babies to die, once upon the time people were horrified when news of that came from shitholes like China, now it is a sign of being an enlightened, progressive nation.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
So do I, and I don't remember it being that big a deal. The only "trauma" I experienced, was my mother screaming at me whenever she caught me masturbating (which I stared doing in grade school).




I disagree; strongly. The fact of the matter is that those kids are guaranteed to already know about most of that stuff; five minutes alone with the internet is all they need. I know this because that's how it was for me, and I did it with prudish parents who took supervising their children seriously, back in the days when accessing porn on the internet wasn't nearly as easy as it has become. I'd argue it's best to put what they've already learned into the proper context, and show them the difference between porn logic, and reality.
I mean maybe but why in the world would you trust the schools to do so? Even if your argument is valid letting a bunch of leftists. Teach your child about sexuality is a mistake it's also lazy. Be a parent and do your job.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
I mean maybe but why in the world would you trust the schools to do so? Even if your argument is valid letting a bunch of leftists. Teach your child about sexuality is a mistake it's also lazy. Be a parent and do your job.
You're not wrong, but that's a separate argument altogether.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Naw it's directly connected "sex Ed" isn't something schools should be doing at all. The meer exsitence of such an argument is a damning indictment of our faliure as parents. YOU not the fucking state are responsible for your child's education. Pathetic lazyness diguts me.
Not really? You're basically trying to argue that parents shouldn't be sending their children to public schools at all.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Not really? You're basically trying to argue that parents shouldn't be sending their children to public schools at all.

If their kids can learn how basic reproduction works on the internet, then why bother with public school?

Because aside from teaching them how babies are made, they need to learn. The Correct Opinions.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Not really? You're basically trying to argue that parents shouldn't be sending their children to public schools at all.

No, he's arguing that ultimate responsibility for education lies with the parents. Schools are a service parents choose to employ for a significant portion of this, but they hold deferred, not ultimate responsibility.

Besides, one of the largest determining factors as to whether or not a school will do well for its students, is parental involvement. Significantly more important than budget.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
Not really? You're basically trying to argue that parents shouldn't be sending their children to public schools at all.
No I am not don't put words in mouth bro. If I wanted to say that rest assured i would say it outright. What your doing here is no different then when the left screams "dogwhistle". Don't assume others thought process.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
No I am not don't put words in mouth bro. If I wanted to say that rest assured i would say it outright. What your doing here is no different then when the left screams "dogwhistle". Don't assume others thought process.
I'm sorry, but you're not giving me much to work off of. How else was I supposed to interpret the statement "YOU not the fucking state are responsible for your child's education"? I wasn't even saying that such an argument is meritless.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
I'm sorry, but you're not giving me much to work off of. How else was I supposed to interpret the statement "YOU not the fucking state are responsible for your child's education"? I wasn't even saying that such an argument is meritless.
Fair enough I haven't thought much about public schools. As I send mine to private school where I have control and oversight. I feel teaching sex or really anything should be subject to direct parentel oversight. Especially in a public school as the state should always be subordinate to the citzens.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Fair enough I haven't thought much about public schools. As I send mine to private school where I have control and oversight. I feel teaching sex or really anything should be subject to direct parentel oversight. Especially in a public school as the state should always be subordinate to the citzens.
Which is fair, in my opinion. I'm not against more parents take an active role in teaching their kids in theory, that would be wonderful; but that's not the system we have. Unfortunately, few parents seem to share your opinion; most seem to either not care one way or another, or they'd rather their kids not know what sex even is until they've moved out of the house. Personally, I'd rather the kids be educated about sex to some degree, because as I pointed out, they're going to learn about every nasty detail regardless; better to put that into context than to simply leave them to their own devices.

Now; do I trust public schools to do that without screwing it up? Of course not; but in my opinion that has more to do with the overall quality of the public education system, or lack thereof, than my having anything against teaching this sort of thing to kids.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
Which is fair, in my opinion. I'm not against more parents take an active role in teaching their kids in theory, that would be wonderful; but that's not the system we have. Unfortunately, few parents seem to share your opinion; most seem to either not care one way or another, or they'd rather their kids not know what sex even is until they've moved out of the house. Personally, I'd rather the kids be educated about sex to some degree, because as I pointed out, they're going to learn about every nasty detail regardless; better to put that into context than to simply leave them to their own devices.

Now; do I trust public schools to do that without screwing it up? Of course not; but in my opinion that has more to do with the overall quality of the public education system, or lack thereof, than my having anything against teaching this sort of thing to kids.
Which is why I don't use public schools. Besides there's more to "the talk" then just biology. Personally I start with how to get a girl,followed by how to pleasure said girl,and finally condoms etc. A huge issue in our society is young dudes flat not knowing how to speak to women. Let alone wifing her up I'll teach my boy how. As I have a vested interest in such to ensure my line. I totally agree public education is garbage tier (usally) though.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
The Ahmaud Arbery murder. It was basically a lynching. There is an argument that can be made that it wasn't racially motivated, but everything else fits. A bunch of white men try to falsely arrest a black man, then kill him while he tries to escape. Then somehow the people go two months without being arrested. The fact pattern didn't change because of the video, they could have been arrested by their own statement.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top