Five minutes of hate news

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
The ones I was personally aware of was regarding the Kuril, Dokdo, and the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, with the Okinotori Reef thrown in there (alternatively Okinotori islands, depending on whether you are in Japan or not.) Are those the proper names for the disputes you've mentioned?
AFAIK yed
 

UltimatePaladin

Well-known member
Honestly have no clue about what they have
Alright, so China's disputes that I'm tracking, at this moment:
  • Arunachal Pradesh/South Tibet
  • Tirpani, Bara Hotti, and Samdu Valleys
  • Demjok/Demchok
  • Shaksam Valley
  • Aksai Chin
  • Spratly Islands/Paracel Islands/Scarborough Shoal/Maccelsfield Bank (South China Sea)
  • Bhutan (North and West)
And from last time:
  • Senkaku Islands
  • Okinotori Islands/Reef
Any problems with those, or do those sound about right?
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Alright, so China's disputes that I'm tracking, at this moment:
  • Arunachal Pradesh/South Tibet
  • Tirpani, Bara Hotti, and Samdu Valleys
  • Demjok/Demchok
  • Shaksam Valley
  • Aksai Chin
  • Spratly Islands/Paracel Islands/Scarborough Shoal/Maccelsfield Bank (South China Sea)
  • Bhutan (North and West)
And from last time:
  • Senkaku Islands
  • Okinotori Islands/Reef
Any problems with those, or do those sound about right?
Sounds about right
 

UltimatePaladin

Well-known member
Sounds about right
Okay, so by the numbers, it looks like China is involved in more territorial disputes than Japan is (even with me condensing the South China sea disputes into one.) How are you judging that Japan is ahead of China in terms of Territorial disputes?

Yeah, that’s the one I was thinking about

I think there’s starting to be problems in relation to their creation of artificial islands
It's the PRC trying to solidify their control of that sea - I'm not 100% on what the impact of those islands will be, but politically, that's what it is.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
It's the PRC trying to solidify their control of that sea - I'm not 100% on what the impact of those islands will be, but politically, that's what it is.

All I recall was that there was oil there and it was first discovered by a filipino fisherman who took years to finally get his discovery acknowledged

There were remains of Filipino or Pre-Spanish Filipinos there, but China lays claim over it and this dispute was still going on for years

Honestly, the Chinese probably could "just take it" and I don't think they'd have much fuss against them let alone actual resistance
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag

I'm honestly weirded out by how much courts take the sides of women or give them such light sentences in these sorts of cases
 

ATP

Well-known member
Oh,trust me, having been through the Korean war museum, a place that shows the whole history of the Korean peninsula and its wars.
Japan invaded Korea WAY before their occupation and was beaten back, as was when the Koreans tried to invade Japan. Then came the 1800s when Japan became a power house and occupied Korea via invasion. Korea was just starting to become its own modern area when Japan invaded. They were Japan's first stake in the mainland of Asia

I once read,that First japaneese settlers who created first states there come from Korea,and that Japan forbid archeologist from open graves of their first emperors,becouse they were from korean dynasty.
Could it be true,or not?

About war anybody against China - i read books made by polish tourists in Central Africa and South America - apparently elites made bussines with China there,but common people hate China guts.Which means nothing,since said elites rule there.

If it is true,
,even if people hate China approach,states would not fight them,becouse China arleady buyed their elites.
 

ATP

Well-known member
See, from anyone else, this would be antisemitism, but knowing you, it's just stupidity.

That you think there is a gay mafia from 1000 AD says everything I need to say here. I think I need to apologize for calling you a homophobe. You aren't. You're just incredibly dumb.

Stupidity from man who could not comprehend,that stating that protestants must follow their religion or change to other do not mean supporting protestants ? thanks for making me laugh.

Now:
1Yes,orthodox jews have right to belive whatever they want and follow that as long as law do not forbid it.You could name it as antisemitism.
2.You again is unable to read,There is no homosexual mafia from 1049,becouse Inquisition eventually destroyed them.Many inquisition victims was boy rapists.Lavendar mafia which exist now was created after Vaticanum 2.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
protestants must follow their religion
Just to clarify, by follow their religion, ATP means murdering gays. Not an exaggeration:
Thus protestants and jews must advocate death penalty for homosexuals,becouse that is what Jahwe did in Sodom.If they do no like that,they should change religion.

1Yes,orthodox jews have right to belive whatever they want and follow that as long as law do not forbid it.You could name it as antisemitism.
2.You again is unable to read,There is no homosexual mafia from 1049,becouse Inquisition eventually destroyed them.Many inquisition victims was boy rapists.Lavendar mafia which exist now was created after Vaticanum 2.
Given that the child rape started well before Vatican 2, I think your conspiracy theorizing needs some work, or a time machine. Though let's be honest, now I want to read this Alt history of the inquisition hunting down the lavender mafia. I might write it myself, it sounds hilarious. ATP, tell me more about this imaginary history of yours.

My bet is that the lavender mafia was simply so outrageously dressed that they could not be stopped. Only the Curches's superior interior decor could slow them, until the Inquisition could develop a fabulous new style that blew the lavender mafia away (or just blew them, historians are divided on this topic).
 

ATP

Well-known member
Just to clarify, by follow their religion, ATP means murdering gays. Not an exaggeration:



Given that the child rape started well before Vatican 2, I think your conspiracy theorizing needs some work, or a time machine. Though let's be honest, now I want to read this Alt history of the inquisition hunting down the lavender mafia. I might write it myself, it sounds hilarious. ATP, tell me more about this imaginary history of yours.

My bet is that the lavender mafia was simply so outrageously dressed that they could not be stopped. Only the Curches's superior interior decor could slow them, until the Inquisition could develop a fabulous new style that blew the lavender mafia away (or just blew them, historians are divided on this topic).

You still do not undarstandt what you read.
1.i write that people which religion advocate killing x should killing x or change religion.
I do not say that such religion are good or bad.Now,undarstandt ?

2.i wrote that homosexual mafia from 1049 was later destroyed by Inquisition later/much later - Inquisition was made about 1200/,not that there were no boy rapists in Church after that.
Difference is as if you said,that destroing Al Capone mafia meaned that there were no more street thugs.

Undarstandt,now ?
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
You still do not undarstandt what you read.
1.i write that people which religion advocate killing x should killing x or change religion.
I do not say that such religion are good or bad.Now,undarstandt ?

2.i wrote that homosexual mafia from 1049 was later destroyed by Inquisition later/much later - Inquisition was made about 1200/,not that there were no boy rapists in Church after that.
Difference is as if you said,that destroing Al Capone mafia meaned that there were no more street thugs.

Undarstandt,now ?

Seriously. Take the time to clean your posts up. It's getting harder and harder to understand what you're trying to say.

Also, Christianity does not advocate killing homosexuals. The harshest punishment it supports is being removed from the church community.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Seriously. Take the time to clean your posts up. It's getting harder and harder to understand what you're trying to say.

Also, Christianity does not advocate killing homosexuals. The harshest punishment it supports is being removed from the church community.

Keep in mind english is his second language, and english is a bitch to learn.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top