Five minutes of hate news

Okay, first Sharia is not more libertarian than Western legal systems. There are no civil liberties in Sharia.

But the rest I do agree with, but doesn't address my complaint: my complaint was that the punishment for defamation (anything non-monetary) would be too harsh.
Civil liberties like being able to have gay sex or smoke weed is a small part of libertarianism. The largest part is freedom of contracts.

Also I would disagree someone could do more harm to you with words, than by punching you in the face. And no I'm not talking about feelings either. I mean that if someone falsely accuses you of a crime like rape for example will be MUCH more damaging than a slap across the face.
 
Civil liberties like being able to have gay sex or smoke weed is a small part of libertarianism. The largest part is freedom of contracts.

Also I would disagree someone could do more harm to you with words, than by punching you in the face. And no I'm not talking about feelings either. I mean that if someone falsely accuses you of a crime like rape for example will be MUCH more damaging than a slap across the face.
No, it isn't. The idea that libertarianism is mostly about economic freedom is simply wrong: far more important is self ownership. And women especially do not have self ownership under Sharia. They can't drive, walk around freely, wear reasonable clothing, etc. You don't have freedom to convert away from Islam, you aren't free to draw a picture of Mohammed, there is no civil liberty in a Sharia system.

Also, there isn't freedom of contracts as you can't do loans for interest. My guess is that there are other stupid ass rules as well.

Also I would disagree someone could do more harm to you with words, than by punching you in the face. And no I'm not talking about feelings either. I mean that if someone falsely accuses you of a crime like rape for example will be MUCH more damaging than a slap across the face.
That's more than defamation though. If they report it to the cops, that's effectively attempted false imprisonment (IDK what it is legally). And lying under oath is another, different crime. Perhaps have an actual crime for 'false allegation'. Oh wait, they do.

The reason why I don't support a harsh penalty for defamation specifically is because the vast majority of defamatory lies aren't that bad, and I know that every law will be abused.

Also, those lies aren't what was alleged here either. No one was falsely accused of a crime, no one is alleged to have done so. Someone's fee fees got hurt and they ran to cry to daddy government.
 
defamation is the legal term for when someone harms you with words, yes.

they still potentially did way more harm to you than a slap across the face
Yes, but assualt is the legal word for when someone harms you. Murder is assualt, not all assualt is murder. Basically, there are legal levels to this. Now Defamation works as a catch all on the civil side as it's about money for restitution/punishment. But on the criminal side there are levels. And I don't think simple defamation should be result in criminal punishment, because I know it will be abused by those in power to attack those not in power. It's better to have a higher bar (like false report to the police, lying on the stand, etc).
 
You ignore the value of standing on principle. Leftists are now losing because they stopped standing on principle, and people call them out on their bullshit. On top of that, your behavior is the only thing you are in control of, so it's of primary importance that you yourself act morally, damn what others do. Living a righteous life is its own reward.
If owning the banks, media, governments in most of the world, getting most of the planet vaccinated against their will, and cutting off baby genitals on a daily basis is losing, then we're all the biggest winners in history. XD
That's how they got to such a position, through evil, not good.
 
If owning the banks, media, governments in most of the world, getting most of the planet vaccinated against their will, and cutting off baby genitals on a daily basis is losing, then we're all the biggest winners in history. XD
That's how they got to such a position, through evil, not good.
No, they got there by having principles they could use that they stuck too. The ACLU won by using sticking to principles even when it hurt them (Brandenburg, for example). Many of those principles were good principles also (equality under the law, freedom of speech, etc.) that resonated with Americans. Others were shit principles, that still motivated individuals to get shit done. Now that they've won, they began abandoning those principles in favor of the boot, because they think they can't lose and all intellectual rigor has left. To clarify, the people with principles left the political machinery used to win, because it wasn't needed anymore.

Standing on principles is how you win. It's how the Left got here, it's how others can win as well.

Once you abandon principles, you cannot win. Not because you won't have the power, but because what you create will be odious, just in the opposite direction.
 
I am being a realist. People are too cowardly to really stand up to it all, and the leftists hold all, they control all- look at family courts and the schools. Look at society.

Yes, the past eighteen months have black pilled me once and for all. Grow up and face reality, IT. IS. OVER.
The reality I'm seeing here is that the left controls your perception of reality, and through it they control you.

Stop trying to convince other people to surrender to them.
 
ahahahaahahaha.

on wait, you are serious? let me laugh harder
The idea that the ACLU has been about anything other then the cause and power is truly hilarious. I think my favorite example of that is the late RBG, formerly of the ACLU, who helped invent a constitutional right to abortion based on an obviously nonsense case from someone who later repeatedly recanted all for political gain.
 
I would give you a more complete answer @Abhorsen but it is 9:00 AM here and I need to get shit done. However you gave some food for thought, considering how a YouTuber in Brasil is being prosecuted for questioning the Supreme Federal Tribunal judge Moraes...
 
The leftists are NOT losing. Get that through your heads, it's over- because it is over. They have won.

They hold the schools, colleges, political offices, judiciary, Dungeons and Dragons, the media, Hollywood, everything big and small. This is because the ones behind it all ("ten ton t-rex") have always understood two things people, even those in the military, always forget:

1) Wars are lost when kings fall, not pawns. You could wipe out ANTIFA with some magical force or phaser fire from the U.S.S. Enterprise tomorrow, it will make absolutely no difference because they are just cannon fodder. The ones behind this all will remain and the cycle will begin again.

2) Wars are not necessarily won by massive troop movements. Remember the story of the 300 Spartans? They held off a massive army for quite some time simply by holding a key position. Well, the leftist elite know that you win wars by holding key nodes, the high ground. By controlling the courts, the media, and the schools a mere several thousand can prevail against millions.

And again, people are brainwashed cowards. They will turn on their own to pander to those who hate them. This is why it is already over and any other argument is just wishful thinking. I cannot even post artwork here for those reasons.
You dropped this!

black-pill.jpg
 
You dropped this!

black-pill.jpg
I mean the black pill is not wrong. We have some wins like getting rid of affirmative action and letting people choose who to do business with. But our leaders are stupid at getting more people so they ensured that the youth will always support the leftests with their decision to stop financial aid forgiveness.
 
I mean the black pill is not wrong. We have some wins like getting rid of affirmative action and letting people choose who to do business with. But our leaders are stupid at getting more people so they ensured that the youth will always support the leftests with their decision to stop financial aid forgiveness.

Most of the people who wanted that were leftists anyway and wouldn’t be likely to change. Besides, since when I’m the past few decades has giving ground to the Left worked out for us?
 
Most of the people who wanted that were leftists anyway and wouldn’t be likely to change. Besides, since when I’m the past few decades has giving ground to the Left worked out for us?
No I'm saying that abandoning the universities and letting the left capture them was a stupid idea, that was the start of the left winning society.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top