CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
You do realize I meant kicking them out from office and the voters need to help in the investigation themselves or try and watch out for everything
Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow
- Thread starter MelancholicMechanicus
- Start date
You do realize I meant kicking them out from office and the voters need to help in the investigation themselves or try and watch out for everything
lordmcdeath
Well-known member
I was being mildly factitious. I thought you meant removing any RINO voters as well from the party. I wasn't assuming a Night of Long Knives. Just an elimination of any sort of dissent from the Party along with the purity tests that would accompany it.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Never thought that far, but they maybe able to find guys who may actually be in on the cut
Here is Trump's lawsuit adds to the Texas Case, by the standards of most litigation by his team it's pretty good. No obvious typos and the only ob first factual error only occurs in the second paragraph. Apparently, the 1960 presidential election didn't happen in the Trumpverse.
But please continue believing that these lawsuits matter and will somehow stop the inauguration of president-elect Joe Biden.
1960 United States presidential election - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Wargamer08
Well-known member
You are aware that was also a historically rigged election too right? Like with the exact same stuff that they are allegeding today, happened in that one. Just without the internet.
Not really, even if Illinois was rigged which there isn't any actual proof JFK would have still won. And they didn't even mention that meaning they didn't even bother doing a simple google search, should tell you how seriously they are taking this lawsuit.
Wargamer08
Well-known member
Or they want people to look into it themselves and find the same kind of stop and start counting, observer intimidation and big city ballot stuffing and draw their own conclusions.
That's now what a legal filling is supposed to do, but you are right that it intended to convince rubes like you rather than actually achieve anything.
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
You Deboonkers are sad and you keep getting sadder.
The Phule
The Phule on the Hill
Nah, I'm pretty sure that they'll just point out that the Republican Senate basically refused to listen to any of the allegations for Trump and fast-tracked an acquittal as an excuse, and the Democratic Base will be 100% on board with that.
There'll be false equivalencies like that all this coming year, you know.
Wargamer08
Well-known member
Wait you think this is going to be settled by careful examination of the law and constitution instead of political pressure and public interest? Ok then.
Me: Legal Filling makes an obvious factual error that 2 seconds of googling could have corrected
You: What a looser ?, pointing out facts
So then they simply won't let the case be heard if we are going by this logic. This is becoming incredibly sad, why did they dismiss the PA case if they wanted to change the election results?
ShieldWife
Marchioness
I’m not saying that Trump’s legal team are doing the best job ever, they aren’t, but keep in mind that they only have a few days to do a job that should require months.
Wargamer08
Well-known member
So you’re illiterate as well as a liar. One whom clearly can’t tell the difference between dismissing an emergency injunction and dismissing the case. At this point you’re clearly just a shill.
The Case is dead, the whole case was dismissed at the district court level with the judge finding it as having no prospect of success.The supreme court upheld that decision. You're only setting yourself up for disappointment for believing in nonsense.
Trump's legal team has been doing an amazing job. They've created a lot of smoke for morons like you to belive there's fraud and allowed the Trump Campaign to grift millions.
Been like this for a month
The Phule
The Phule on the Hill
I suspect the supreme court will not overturn the election results, as it would probably lead to extreme violence: For every republican who thinks that the election was stolen, there's a Democrat who thinks that these legal battles are an attempt by the Republicans to steal the election.
Ultimately, undoing an election would likely result in greater unrest than letting the election sit as. There's more 'break points' in a change in transition. More places where people can refuse to do things, where violence can break out. Places where Biden could refuse to leave office, where the House could refuse... Inertia's a bitch, and changing the results at this state would give more people the opportunity to be obstructionist than simply allowing the election to proceed as it should.
Can you imagine the violence that would have occurred had, after Trump's election, the Supreme Court had ruled that actually Hilary had won? It would have been a lot of violence. And remember the head-space that the Democrats are in right now. If the Supreme Court hands the election to Trump, iiiit's going to be bad.
So, alas, I don't think that this is going to amount to anything, regardless of the validity.
Ultimately, undoing an election would likely result in greater unrest than letting the election sit as. There's more 'break points' in a change in transition. More places where people can refuse to do things, where violence can break out. Places where Biden could refuse to leave office, where the House could refuse... Inertia's a bitch, and changing the results at this state would give more people the opportunity to be obstructionist than simply allowing the election to proceed as it should.
Can you imagine the violence that would have occurred had, after Trump's election, the Supreme Court had ruled that actually Hilary had won? It would have been a lot of violence. And remember the head-space that the Democrats are in right now. If the Supreme Court hands the election to Trump, iiiit's going to be bad.
So, alas, I don't think that this is going to amount to anything, regardless of the validity.
You guy just keeps moving the goalposts, you keep trying to find lawsuit to stick your hope into it overturning the results of the election and when it fails you come up with a new court case. Anyway the above court decision will likley be the response by SCOTUS to the texas fillings
It will be violence either way dude.
And I do think it will be overturned, especially since it has not been declared yet
The Phule
The Phule on the Hill
I'm aware that there will be violence either way. I just suspect that more people are willing to sit on their asses and not make any changes if Biden is permitted to take office, simply because that's the narrative most people have already swallowed. The media, including Fox, is reporting that Biden won.
Changing tracks now? That's going to shock people, and shocked people are more likely to move. I suspect that the amount of violence from Biden taking office will be less than the violence of an overturn would be.
But that's just my opinion. Please don't mind me. I mostly lurk.
You do know most State Guards are not likely to want to crack down on their own states. We would have to recall our soldiers from abroad for local peacekeeping. It would be ugly.
Even with the Insurrection Act, it would be ugly.