Easily rectified outlaw public service unions completely. As a bonus you'll make public schools viable again as incompetant teachers can be fired.Public sector unions were a mistake.
Do you know how much unions contribute to the Democratic Party? Especially teacher’s unions?Easily rectified outlaw public service unions completely. As a bonus you'll make public schools viable again as incompetant teachers can be fired.
Oh I'm aware the Commies need them. All that does is add another reason to outlaw them.Do you know how much unions contribute to the Democratic Party? Especially teacher’s unions?
They’d never let that happen.
Unless you figure out a way to also give employees more power in the workplace (which I have some ideas on), that will just create different problems.Easily rectified outlaw public service unions completely. As a bonus you'll make public schools viable again as incompetant teachers can be fired.
Easy don't work for them. There's other jobs don't like the terms don't take the job.Unless you figure out a way to also give employees more power in the workplace (which I have some ideas on), that will just create different problems.
I actually agree, but the issue arises from the fact that quitting your job, or even just taking the time to pick and choose it, really isn't an option for most people; due to a combination of factors including having a narrow skill set, potentially being blacklisted in the marketplace by a spurned employer, lack of funds to afford the downtime necessary to find a new job, et cetera, et cetera.Easy don't work for them. There's other jobs don't like the terms don't take the job.
It's gonna piss you off but all of that is an excuse. That's all I'm going to say as we have wildly different expectations of folks.I actually agree, but the issue arises from the fact that quitting your job, or even just taking the time to pick and choose it, really isn't an option for most people; due to a combination of factors including having a narrow skill set, potentially being blacklisted in the marketplace by a spurned employer, lack of funds to afford the downtime necessary to find a new job, et cetera, et cetera.
This is one of the reasons I support the idea of a Universal Basic Income, or at least one particular form of it; because it would give workers the power to quit or refuse a job whenever they felt they were being treated unfairly, without having to worry about if they'll lose everything in doing so.
No worries; I am well aware that we have totally different perspectives, and I would not have it any other way. How else am I going to develop a deeper understanding of what I believe, if I fail to interact with people who don't think as I do, and challenge me to defend my position? It's not a fun process, but true self-improvement rarely is.It's gonna piss you off but all of that is an excuse. That's all I'm going to say as we have wildly different expectations of folks.
Unless you figure out a way to also give employees more power in the workplace (which I have some ideas on), that will just create different problems.
Unfortunately, you can't eat patriotic duty.Being a civil servant should be seen as a patriotic duty that you will be happy to leave and return to the private sector whenever your services are no longer required.
Unfortunately, you can't eat patriotic duty.
Nobody forces you to become a civil servant.
Would be wrong if I think government and military positions should be as “rewarding” as Starship Troopers?
Like I recall even in the books, civilians don’t consider becoming a citizen “worth it” and politics’ not much compared to becoming a businessman
Has to be a rewardless-duty that by the end ONLY takes in those capable and truly willing and wanting that sort of “duty” without care for power or fame
Would be wrong if I think government and military positions should be as “rewarding” as Starship Troopers?
Like I recall even in the books, civilians don’t consider becoming a citizen “worth it” and politics’ not much compared to becoming a businessman
Has to be a rewardless-duty that by the end ONLY takes in those capable and truly willing and wanting that sort of “duty” without care for power or fame
But in general the civil service should be as small as possible to accomplish the needs of the country, or one of the diuvers states, and should be accountable to the legislature thereof.
And if you're not going to offer people anything as compensation for becoming one, other than fulfilling some nebulous sense of "patriotic duty", nobody will; unless you force them to.Nobody forces you to become a civil servant.
Or people who really want bribes, or power. Either way people you probably don’t want doing it.And if you're not going to offer people anything as compensation for becoming one, other than fulfilling some nebulous sense of "patriotic duty", nobody will; unless you force them to.