Arielle Scarcella, Youtube's Most Hated Lesbian, Leaves the Left

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
So for those who don't know, Arielle Scarcella is a really good LGBT youtuber. She speaks to the people who are actually LGBT, not just twitter crazies. Because of her calling out crazy trans youtubers, and having the audacity to point out that some of them were shaming lesbians who weren't comfortable having sex with a person with a penis, she has been shamed by all sorts of SJWs.

This has led to her getting ever closer to going full red pill and leaving the left, and she finally did it. Her actual announcement is tomorrow, but she is currently livestreaming this on TimCast IRL.


What's most surprising about this is how far left Arielle's beliefs are, and yet the Left is so toxic even she is leaving.

EDIT: I'm moving the video she posted up here:
 
Last edited:
@Abhorsen
I don’t think she will ever be considered a “minority” ever again

Honestly, she’s proof against the whole Slippery Slope Fallacy and the Left-Right Dichotomy

There are good and normal people among “minorities” who are stuck with having the crazies “represent” them or worse actually manage to take over “the group” and dictate behavior

But they can’t have all of them
 
Its like the last 4 years are finally starting to catch up to the dems.
I know, right? Man, it took me awhile to wake up too, it always makes me both happy and sad to see someone else finally leaving as well. Happy that they are finally through with the bullshit; sad that they had to go through it.
@Abhorsen
I don’t think she will ever be considered a “minority” ever again

Honestly, she’s proof against the whole Slippery Slope Fallacy and the Left-Right Dichotomy

There are good and normal people among “minorities” who are stuck with having the crazies “represent” them or worse actually manage to take over “the group” and dictate behavior

But they can’t have all of them
Well yeah, but she's not alone with this. There is the whole #WalkAway movement, which was started by a gay man, as well as Blexit. The reason why I think Scarcella matters is how far left she is. Tim Pool is still desperately struggling to reclaim the left, but Arielle is basically a woke poster child. Except she actually comes to her positions honestly and with actual thought, so they don't line up perfectly with what wokeness is. And so she is exiled.
 
I know, right? Man, it took me awhile to wake up too, it always makes me both happy and sad to see someone else finally leaving as well. Happy that they are finally through with the bullshit; sad that they had to go through it.

Unfortunately I don’t think everybody will be able to make that shift and may get worse instead

It doesn’t help, that I think many are aware of their problems but have to lie and deflect and stay in an echo chamber by banning dissent

I think some like Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn are psychopaths

Well yeah, but she's not alone with this. There is the whole #WalkAway movement, which was started by a gay man, as well as Blexit. The reason why I think Scarcella matters is how far left she is. Tim Pool is still desperately struggling to reclaim the left, but Arielle is basically a woke poster child. Except she actually comes to her positions honestly and with actual thought, so they don't line up perfectly with what wokeness is. And so she is exiled.

Never heard of Blexit

As for #WalkAway, didn’t know it was started by a gay dude

Tim believes in Leftist policies, but only to a healthy extent, unfortunately I don’t think he’ll find his politicians
 
Never heard of Blexit

As for #WalkAway, didn’t know it was started by a gay dude

Tim believes in Leftist policies, but only to a healthy extent, unfortunately I don’t think he’ll find his politicians
Blexit is short for Black Exit, started by Candace Owens. I don't agree with much that she says, but it's another example of a leave the left movement started by a minority.

The way that the left loses is by splitting off its component parts through a dual strategy of leftist crazyiness, and the right being welcoming. Most minority civil rights have been obtained by now, so much of the leftist appeal has collapsed. They are a coalition fighting for an ever smaller number of rights, and the more they succeeded, the more irrelevant they became. So they had to add other causes. This meant that eventually, the LGBT movement was added on. But once gay marriage was passed, they needed a new issue. Climate change isn't selling, so calling everyone racist it is.
 
Blexit is short for Black Exit, started by Candace Owens. I don't agree with much that she says, but it's another example of a leave the left movement started by a minority.

The way that the left loses is by splitting off its component parts through a dual strategy of leftist crazyiness, and the right being welcoming. Most minority civil rights have been obtained by now, so much of the leftist appeal has collapsed. They are a coalition fighting for an ever smaller number of rights, and the more they succeeded, the more irrelevant they became. So they had to add other causes. This meant that eventually, the LGBT movement was added on. But once gay marriage was passed, they needed a new issue. Climate change isn't selling, so calling everyone racist it is.

What about Immigration, Islamophobia and Gun Rights?

You mentioned Candace Owens right? That douchebag from New Zealand who did the ChristTheChurch massacre used her name in his “manifesto”

The moment people are immunized from “guilt” being used against them alongside accusations is when people really get pissed off and actually start arguing with logic
 


And here is her video officially announcing she's leaving the left. Basically, she covers all the crazy parts of the LGBT movement in a single short video.
 
Last edited:
This is a major problem when you are a interest group and you marry yourself to one political coalition, that coalition can then take advantage of you. The thing is, most of those coalitions formed in the US not because that party courted the interest group, but because the other side was anathema to them.

Take, for instance, Gun rights and Pro-life folks. They aren't in the Republican tent because the Republicans actively courted them, hardly, they were basically forced to join the Republicans because the Democrats got so extreme on their major issues that they had no choice but to make common cause with the Republicans. The Pro-life vote was taken for granted for YEAR by the Republicans, and some would argue it still is, but because the Dems are completely intransigent on their stance of abortion on demand at any time for any reason, well, they're stuck there.

The LGBT interest group is much the same way, due to the earlier Pro-life movement ending up with the Republicans, and thereby attaching the Religious Right to the Republican brand, who were staunchly opposed to LGBT interests, the LGBT interest group was forced into alliance with the Democrats. The thing is, the Dems actually did push their issues for a time and managed to eek out a narrow victory via the courts. At this point, a lot of the LGBT folks were content, but then Dems finally revealed their REAL plan for the LGBT issues, which was to weaponize them against the Religious Right to drive them out of polite society via lawfaire, and a lot of LGBT folks actually bought into the "live and let live" and the "same sex marriage won't impact you"... but then they were weaponized to go after religious conservatives, and being used to harass small businesses out of business isn't something that many people find appealing. There's a reason there's many LGBT folks who have been sympathetic to places like Masterpiece Bakery, as, well, when one side has the force of government and the other is a small business owner, guess who looks like the villain to a LOT of folks, even LGBT individuals.

What this leads to is that the critical LGBT issues are mostly addressed via both unfair laws being repealed or overturned and the systemic cultural acceptance that the media pushed. At this point, the LGBT issues start to fall away from being the most critical issues that an LGBT person is interested in and so they begin to reevaluate their alliance to the Dems.

The only minority group that wasn't really "driven to" the other side is the Black vote. Rather, the Democrats began heavily courting the Black vote in the 1940s under FDR (which is when you start seeing the switch from Blacks voting mostly Republican due to Emancipation to voting Dem) and sealed up with Johnson as the Dems used the media to proclaim they were the critical part in passing the Civil Rights Act and such laws (even though it faced no systemic opposition from the Republicans). This shift was then also enforced by the media and Democrats pushing the "Southern Strategy" story about party realignment as well as the Republicans becoming more fiscally conservative in a way that made them look like they didn't care about blacks. Since then though, it appears that Blacks are beginning to question if that alliance was worth it, as Dems rarely address black issues, and the things they have undertaken appear to have been highly destructive. So again, a reassessment is underway.
 
This is a major problem when you are a interest group and you marry yourself to one political coalition, that coalition can then take advantage of you. The thing is, most of those coalitions formed in the US not because that party courted the interest group, but because the other side was anathema to them.

Take, for instance, Gun rights and Pro-life folks. They aren't in the Republican tent because the Republicans actively courted them, hardly, they were basically forced to join the Republicans because the Democrats got so extreme on their major issues that they had no choice but to make common cause with the Republicans. The Pro-life vote was taken for granted for YEAR by the Republicans, and some would argue it still is, but because the Dems are completely intransigent on their stance of abortion on demand at any time for any reason, well, they're stuck there.

The LGBT interest group is much the same way, due to the earlier Pro-life movement ending up with the Republicans, and thereby attaching the Religious Right to the Republican brand, who were staunchly opposed to LGBT interests, the LGBT interest group was forced into alliance with the Democrats. The thing is, the Dems actually did push their issues for a time and managed to eek out a narrow victory via the courts. At this point, a lot of the LGBT folks were content, but then Dems finally revealed their REAL plan for the LGBT issues, which was to weaponize them against the Religious Right to drive them out of polite society via lawfaire, and a lot of LGBT folks actually bought into the "live and let live" and the "same sex marriage won't impact you"... but then they were weaponized to go after religious conservatives, and being used to harass small businesses out of business isn't something that many people find appealing. There's a reason there's many LGBT folks who have been sympathetic to places like Masterpiece Bakery, as, well, when one side has the force of government and the other is a small business owner, guess who looks like the villain to a LOT of folks, even LGBT individuals.

What this leads to is that the critical LGBT issues are mostly addressed via both unfair laws being repealed or overturned and the systemic cultural acceptance that the media pushed. At this point, the LGBT issues start to fall away from being the most critical issues that an LGBT person is interested in and so they begin to reevaluate their alliance to the Dems.

The only minority group that wasn't really "driven to" the other side is the Black vote. Rather, the Democrats began heavily courting the Black vote in the 1940s under FDR (which is when you start seeing the switch from Blacks voting mostly Republican due to Emancipation to voting Dem) and sealed up with Johnson as the Dems used the media to proclaim they were the critical part in passing the Civil Rights Act and such laws (even though it faced no systemic opposition from the Republicans). This shift was then also enforced by the media and Democrats pushing the "Southern Strategy" story about party realignment as well as the Republicans becoming more fiscally conservative in a way that made them look like they didn't care about blacks. Since then though, it appears that Blacks are beginning to question if that alliance was worth it, as Dems rarely address black issues, and the things they have undertaken appear to have been highly destructive. So again, a reassessment is underway.
Yeah. almost everything the LGBT movement wants, they got, so regular LGBT folk can focus on other things now. We have social acceptance, the privacy of our bedrooms, right to marry, medical transitions, can mostly serve in the military (still annoyed at Trump for that, what an unforced error), AIDS is mostly solved, etc. On a purely selfish level, there's little more the left can give me, so why help them at all? We gave them decades of loyal votes, then we were finally paid over the past two decades.
 
She's spot on about the LGBTQ etc crowd turning into a cult. I have some experience with cults, and the crazy left has all the hallmarks of one. The most telling item is their inability to tolerate dissent of any on any issue, no matter how small, from inside the group. You have to take the whole enchilada no matter how inconsequential the point of disagreement. "Apostates" are more evil than the opposition, the community would burn them at the stake if they could.
 
At some point, I think we’ll be getting things like Kamala Khan being retconned as not-a-muslim

Or whatever first transsexual or transgender superhero character as always having been just biologically and mentally male or female

Because let’s face it, entertainment creators went from just having fun and making money to trying to change the world and promote certain politics to the extreme
 
know, right? Man, it took me awhile to wake up too, it always makes me both happy and sad to see someone else finally leaving as well. Happy that they are finally through with the bullshit; sad that they had to go through it.
What would you say is your experience current views or have you written a testimony or something? I mean it's my understanding that most people who believe in the left did so because they were the alternative to religious or cultural institutions that were oppressive to their identity or they believed in the cult of personality of Barack Obama. Once those things sort of ran out or they got what they needed they kind of had to face the now what. I think at least some of the best solution men is what you gone from fighting for survival or just social acknowledgement say gay marriage passing things have to figure out what kind of person you are and live your life and unfortunately as is often the case when someone self reflects they find that there's a lot they don't like about themselves


honestly I'm not even sure if I take the politics or the organization's of the left her what's wrong but the behavior on social media where a lot of the discourses happening it's just really bad. But I'm primarily coming at this to fandom because I'm socially maladjusted and doing almost all my interrelating online. But the big problem is that while I can totally blind to ideas like people way overreacting and being hostile to the idea of gay shipping I can't exactly ignore the fact that shipping as a whole can be bad because everything I disliked about gay shipping happened with a very straight ship with it a donger less-experienced audience in the first series of the avatar The Last Airbender franchise. Which made me painfully realize that these people weren't so much developing a deep-seated love and appreciation for the gay lifestyle or Awakening the gay rights or anything like that but it was just a thing to do when you became adolescent enough like drugs rock and roll.
Ever since then I've adopted a different phrases in order to help check myself like shipping is not social activism. But the number one problem for things was Howard defected discussing things we either had to be all in on reinterpret a character is gay in order so that every activity that they did was in that lens or fighting that and not allowing or creating a general hostile environment for its gay fans as it became a single issue of interpret this character is gay or be gay positive
when the actual media started taking on this cast ... it made things insufferable because essentially all it had to do was Pander a little note to the audience and leave everything else by the wayside. Yeah I'm talking about Steven Universe here
using that as an example people only really started to turn on the show when their version of the woman didn't get their way whether that was the butts Jasper not becoming a lovable goof with the team. Or much more heterosexuality appear lean lapis getting a thousand Second Chances whereas Peridot had to literally reform everything about her
And of course the turning on rose quartz when it turned out it wasn't a lesbian Revolution but the girl who got to run away from home
but really more so it was as people started to identify openly with the character of pearl who hit me with almost all the problems

I don't even have a problem with someone who quote on quote makes being gay their entire personality. People are boring and actually kind of dull. If they don't have a lot of distinct personality we often like the same music want the same goals eat the same food we're really not that unique
it's more when they make being hostile in freaking people out their personality that's always been my problem and I always Associated it with being gay because it seems the number one way being gay was to be an intentional freak out looking to cause trouble as opposed to just self express and be yourself
a racial note so many things were often marketed or told to me not even necessarily the marketing but people this to find me as being black and if I wasn't I wasn't black or I was white on the inside really f****** hurt so it's led to a sort of disconnect on an ethnic side of my culture but not even entirely
it's probably because of that Saint my growing self awareness of how terrible I was with Japanese culture as my anime fandom matured and I still don't speak Japanese that I was probably just old enough and not to hormonal that I could avoid being completely swept up with the woke Brigade but watching it happen to the people I did believe in and follow really hurt I've never really been able to quit them moviebob even later once I was exposed to like Lily Orchard
meet all the worst that and I do feel for the community leaders here but the default option to avoid legal or social ramification is to make sure nobody talks so it feels like there's less and less places to just vent frustration and hope to talk out things so I realize there's certain ways you have to approach a conversation in order so that there's productive development
but it's like we're forced to get along even when we don't and it makes things all the worse so places like here and digital Wild West kind of feel necessary and spacebattles feels like the last Haven to be fair because I got kicked out of rpg.net primarily because I started disagreeing with the overall political tone of rpg.net
I wasn't even swearing and being disruptive just bringing up controversial opinions. But it was like it was always a trick such as when someone died because they wouldn't get aborted and Ireland everybody said well they should have allowed abortions I pointed out that will the actual problem with the liability to the doctors and that eventually led to me getting a notice from the moderators. When I noticed a trend in terms of how politics we're being portrayed in media how Iron Man 3 seem to be re perpetuating the idea that the enemy is the that is pretty much what put me over

all of this is to say that that's been my journey to disillusionment with the left and wokeness as a sort of virtue performance and make me incredibly sensitive to when I see it in others
 
At some point, I think we’ll be getting things like Kamala Khan being retconned as not-a-muslim

...what would be the point?

I mean, it's not like she's some in your face radical Muslim character. She's basically a modern gaming nerd girl who squees over superheroes and is more worried about her ersatz World of Warcraft gaming than anything religious.

Or whatever first transsexual or transgender superhero character as always having been just biologically and mentally male or female

Or, y'know, a writer could actually do something interesting with the character without pushing ideology.

Because let’s face it, entertainment creators went from just having fun and making money to trying to change the world and promote certain politics to the extreme

I'll grant "to the extreme". And some superheroes have always been more or less political or social-minded than others. But there's been an undercurrent of socio-political messages in comic books for a while. Spider-Man's "With great power comes great responsiblity", for instance, forms an essential part of the character, as the one time he sullenly refused to live up to his responsibility (namely letting that robber go) it led to the criminal murdering his father figure. It's not an "in your face" political message, yes (and that's why it's so much better IMHO), but it's hardly just "having fun and making money".

There's also the X-Men, but that's sort of low-lying fruit on this subject given how obvious it is. I'd still be remiss to not plug at least one of their better stories. I'm thinking Claremont's "God Loves, Man Kills".

Anyway, I've said my peace, let's stay on topic: the inevitable result of insane purity spirals that damage the very cause people try to support.
 
Anyway, I've said my peace, let's stay on topic: the inevitable result of insane purity spirals that damage the very cause people try to support.

Sorta more-or-less my point too, though it also makes it so that they ironically embarrass the people they claim to support or simply put they were normal and didn't exactly want to be used against everybody else in fiction(by which I mean I'm pretty sure there are "minorities" who cringe at forced up in your face "diversity")and IRL

And it's pretty easy to co-opt movements or goals and twist them horribly
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top