KilroywasNOTHere
"BEEP!"
To explain in more detail:
1) With democracy, you have system of power which is connected both horizontally and vertically. This means that each political actor has a stake in the central government, as well as the possibility of using said government to promote their own interests. Thus, there is a tendency to accumulate power in the hands of the central government, because everybody will hope to use central government and its power to push their own ideas onto everyone.
2) With monarchy, you have a system of power which is separated vertically, and potentially horizontally as well. This means that central government, instead of presenting a potential for power, is a danger to everyone involved. As a result, there will be a push by local governments to limit the influence of the central government.
King cannot install yes men if he is not installing the men to begin with. Even in middle ages, majority of the officials were installed bottom-up. But they were officials of their own communities, not of the central government. That is a situation I would like to replicate.
how is that any different than what we would have had had "We the people" hadn't gotten conceded and lazy and wanted an empire?