Having paid little attention outside having read the court document, a rather even handed video from Hoeg Law and tid bits from here and there.
My take is rather simple.
The framing of this being around harassment is pure narrative, the court document spends little more than a page on them, while spending pages on prattling about money. The inclusion of those into the lawsuit are clearly used as 'Come back to the table' tactics and to tar Activision-Blizzard, being hot button/favorite issues of the 'games journalism' it's hardly a surprise bottom feeders like Kotaku and Polygon leap like starving dogs at that tiny piece of the lawsuit and ignoring the meat that is all about money.
Could some of that shit happened, probably, but the lawsuit itself doesn't seem to give a crap about it. While the it's the surrounding media circus that loves it.
Recalling someone mentioning one of their sources pinned the 'Call of Duty' incident as on the activision side of this. People have monofoused on the fact this is a lawsuit against Activision-Blizzard, not just Blizzard. The same goes for in talking about pay its addressing the whole company, not Blizzard. Which people have laser focused on due to broader frustrions and irritations with them.
I laugh in the face of idiots who think this is some wind of change in the industry. No, what incidences like this have always led to is: Corporate harder, electric bogabloo revenge of the HR department. Businesses these days are hilarious risk adverse, shit like this gets the 'Lock it down harder' treatment because owning up and fixing it rarely rewards compared to suppressing the fuck out of it and never admitting fault.
Also Bobby and Activision are now the one and only captains of Blizzard now. Boy, did Bobby take down and power move this situation as taking advantage of the bad press and keeping it on Blizzard he's annihilated any pillars of resistence to him or activision quite ruthlessly there.