1910 - Could a Russo-Italian diplomatic pivot, by Germany, break up the Triple Entente?

1910 - Could a Russo-Italian diplomatic pivot, by Germany, break up the Triple Entente?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

raharris1973

Well-known member
What if in 1910 Germany realized how diplomatically isolated it was in Europe, to the extent even of catching wind of the secret Russo-Italian Racconigi Bargain over the Balkans, and understood their only partner was Austria-Hungary, and nobody liked Austria-Hungary.

And, if furthermore, upon making this realization, they decide it is an unacceptable strategic situation, both diplomatic, or for going to war, or if heaven forbid, war his forced on Germany directly or through its alliance with Austria-Hungary. It is an unacceptable strategic situation because it is situation where any way you slice it, defensive war, offensive war, diplomatic conference, too many great powers combine to defeat the German-Austrian coalition.

Therefore the Germans take the next logical step, and *act* diplomatically to shake up the unfavorable coalition.

They quickly ruling out breaking encirclement through France, because revanche.

They rule out counting on Britain, because aloofness, prior disappointment, naval conditions, "perfidiousness"

That leaves Russia....

...and closer to home, regaining Italy's loyalty.

So what if Germany puts out diplomatic feelers to St. Petersburg and to Rome that it is open to a new bargain, it is happy to concede and support resolution of Balkan and Near Eastern issues *entirely* to their satisfaction, and Austro-Hungarian objections are no bar to this. Vienna's foreign policy interests can be thrown entirely under the bus.

So, Russia, if you want carte blanche to shape the future of present-day Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, and the Ottoman Empire (except for the Adriatic shore), you've got Germany's blessing. If Austria objects, we'll tell them we're not supporting them.

So, Italy, if you want carte blanche to shape the future not just of Libya, but also of Montenegro, Albania, Greece, you've got Germany's blessing. If Austria objects, we'll tell them we're not supporting them.

This is not actually promising either of them the land the Austria-Hungary sovereign-ly owns, but anything it might consider externally its sphere of influence.

If Russia and Italy turn out to have an irreconcilable sphere of influence difference (which I doubt), obviously go for Russia, which is more important.

...Have "the talk" with Austria-Hungary. Let them know how things are and they are not getting extended support in Balkan, Near Eastern, Ottoman affairs. If and when they reply, "you just lost your last ally pal", you reply, "were you going to go, pal?", "more countries actually want stuff from you than from us, with the one exception of France, and all of them think they have a better chance of getting it from you."...
 
Last edited:

Buba

A total creep
I agree with your broad strokes. However, as to A-H not having anybody to turn to - there is France and/or Britain.
Berlin throwing the Turkish Straits to Russia means that A-H championing the Ottoman cause gains value for London and - to some extent - Paris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP

Typhonis

Well-known member
Ouch, I say again, ouch. Russia and Germany allied in WW1? That is a nasty butterfly right there. Because now Germany only has to watch A-H and France...If war does break out Russia could go for A-H, with Italy's help. Meanwhile France will have to deal with Germany's attention. Blockading Germany won't do any good unless Britain thinks it can keep Russia from trading with Germany...which would be a hard sell.
 

ATP

Well-known member
What if in 1910 Germany realized how diplomatically isolated it was in Europe, to the extent even of catching wind of the secret Russo-Italian Racconigi Bargain over the Balkans, and understood their only partner was Austria-Hungary, and nobody liked Austria-Hungary.

And, if furthermore, upon making this realization, they decide it is an unacceptable strategic situation, both diplomatic, or for going to war, or if heaven forbid, war his forced on Germany directly or through its alliance with Austria-Hungary. It is an unacceptable strategic situation because it is situation where any way you slice it, defensive war, offensive war, diplomatic conference, too many great powers combine to defeat the German-Austrian coalition.

Therefore the Germans take the next logical step, and *act* diplomatically to shake up the unfavorable coalition.

They quickly ruling out breaking encirclement through France, because revanche.

They rule out counting on Britain, because aloofness, prior disappointment, naval conditions, "perfidiousness"

That leaves Russia....

...and closer to home, regaining Italy's loyalty.

So what if Germany puts out diplomatic feelers to St. Petersburg and to Rome that it is open to a new bargain, it is happy to concede and support resolution of Balkan and Near Eastern issues *entirely* to their satisfaction, and Austro-Hungarian objections are no bar to this. Vienna's foreign policy interests can be thrown entirely under the bus.

So, Russia, if you want carte blanche to shape the future of present-day Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, and the Ottoman Empire (except for the Adriatic shore), you've got Germany's blessing. If Austria objects, we'll tell them we're not supporting them.

So, Italy, if you want carte blanche to shape the future not just of Libya, but also of Montenegro, Albania, Greece, you've got Germany's blessing. If Austria objects, we'll tell them we're not supporting them.

This is not actually promising either of them the land the Austria-Hungary sovereign-ly owns, but anything it might consider externally its sphere of influence.

If Russia and Italy turn out to have an irreconcilable sphere of influence difference (which I doubt), obviously go for Russia, which is more important.

...Have "the talk" with Austria-Hungary. Let them know how things are and they are not getting extended support in Balkan, Near Eastern, Ottoman affairs. If and when they reply, "you just lost your last ally pal", you reply, "were you going to go, pal?", "more countries actually want stuff from you than from us, with the one exception of France, and all of them think they have a better chance of getting it from you."...
Possible.Besides,tsars were practically germans,and german elites ruled Russia,so why not?
To be honest,Germany could forget Italy and ally only with Russia.

I agree with your broad strokes. However, as to A-H not having anybody to turn to - there is France and/or Britain.
Berlin throwing the Turkish Straits to Russia means that A-H championing the Ottoman cause gains value for London and - to some extent - Paris.
True,but A-H and Turkey were not worth Russia then.
Ouch, I say again, ouch. Russia and Germany allied in WW1? That is a nasty butterfly right there. Because now Germany only has to watch A-H and France...If war does break out Russia could go for A-H, with Italy's help. Meanwhile France will have to deal with Germany's attention. Blockading Germany won't do any good unless Britain thinks it can keep Russia from trading with Germany...which would be a hard sell.
Sometching like that.Germans would hold futile french attacks when crushing A-H and leave rest to Russia.
Then,finish France and invade England.

To be honest,dunno why they do not do that....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top