Search results

Well they were more interested in resurrecting the empire in total and thought they could win on there own. By the time they realized allied help wasnt enough it was too late

Got it mixed up with the Ukrainian counteroffensive against the Bolsheviks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1919_Soviet_invasion_of_Ukraine#Ukrainian_counter-offensive Ukraine has full NATO support and roughly 30 years of peace to develop as a state.

It really didn't exist as a state, it was propped up by German and Austrian military units and collapsed nearly as soon as they left. Poland tried to make one too, but that fell apart as they were defeated in their Kiev offensive in 1919. Puppet states are only as good as the people are...

A puppet state IIRC.

Maybe, but the former would require a Habsburg monarch in Poland. Galicia would most likely though go entirely to Poland, not be split given Polish ambitions. Bukowina if it was allowed to go at all would go entirely to Romania. There was no Ukraine really at the time to give it to.

Yes to more 'liberal', no to A-H willingly selling Galicia.

IIRC it had been proposed, but was thought to be unworkable given that the double monarchy was already falling apart. Adding a third crown was not an option anyone took seriously. Good question on Transylvania, I think it might be the terrain and population concentration facilitating...

Maybe if Poland would be locked into an alliance with A-H. I don't know, since AFAIK that issue was not really considered. FF wanted less democracy not more and if anything would want Romanians voting in Hungary to weaken the nobility politically and make them more allied to the crown as an...