Search results for query: *

The Jewish ruling elite are not, which sure isn't something you can say for the Christian white ruling elite when white Christians suffer injustice. How fast did the Kentucky Catholic hierarchy, Kentucky Republicans, the local government, etc, toss the Covington Kids under the bus again? When...

Jewish Power is the ability to mobilize the immense collective power of the Jews to act for group interests. Such as the topic that prompted this thread, the mass anti-Semitism arising from 10/7, particularly in Universities, and the Jewish reaction to such. The massed threatened withdrawal of...

. . . that was entirely intentional with the analogy, and I thought openly implied. Of course America being mighty doesn't imply individual Americans are. Jews being mighty doesn't imply individual Jews are either. Direct analogies can be made with every other point you made. That's the point...

Well, aimed at reasonable discussion or not, what almost all Jews, even those otherwise diametrically opposed, agree should never be allowed to be alluded to, is Jewish power. And Jews are powerful. In America, Jews are the mightiest of all groups that possess even the least sense of group...

On SB, it's against the rules to point out completely neutral facts about Jews. I was infracted for pointing out that when Goldman Sachs came out with a new requirement that all non-Asian IPOs now required at least one "diverse" director, it was pure meaningless virtue signaling, as it's...

That's some amazing twisting and turning to try to force others to discuss your esoteric theory instead of that inconvenient demand for behavior that you now want to pretend doesn't exist.

Why do you think others must engage you in esoteric and unfalsifiable theory instead of your demand on behavior? What I'm telling you is that you must engage each instance of collectivism on its own merits, instead of spouting shibboleths.

Hmm . . . Hmm, what's that? You demanding something not be done even if it objectively works? Because it's automatically bad, right? Giving into collectivism being bad is a shibboleth. Whether it is bad is entirely dependent on the individual instance.

You demanded that people not be treated collectively. Pointing out that people must be treated collectively in war, which is often better than the alternative is a direct counter. War is also not necessarily the only instance in which people must be treated collectively and still being better...

That renders your point true only in the most banal sense. "War is bad" is nothing beyond a shibboleth. War is often better than the alternative, and demanding people not treat a war as a war is nothing more than demanding suicide. It's certainly not doing anything against the common criticism...

There's one place individualism has always failed: War. It would be absurd to demand Israel (though of course the UN and US both are doing exactly that) treat Gazans as individuals. Every Gazan vote, poll, almost every organization, and the testimony of hostages on "civilian" participation...

A leftist married a Jew, they agreed on almost everything, except the right of Muslims to kill Jews with impunity because of the higher place of Muslims on the progressive stack. Story as old as time, or at least the Arab-Israeli Wars for American Jewry. And look, I know anyone claiming to...

Blacks are tools of the left, as are most minorities, while Jews are indisputably lords. Not all Jews, and not "The Jews", but for the last few decades, Jews have provided around half or more of total funding for the Democratic Party, and enjoy commensurate political power. One can simply look...