Search results for query: *

  1. R

    AHC: French Indochina is never Japanese occupied in WWII

    How many guys could the British try to send send there circa 1940-41, against Vichy resistance? Would the British be proclaiming formally they are claiming it for Free French rule, or be open for other political solutions? Moving first would give Japan an *excuse* to intervene also, although...
  2. R

    AHC: French Indochina is never Japanese occupied in WWII

    FFO changes the ballgame, but there could be reasons for somewhat optimistic version of a combined FFO and Italy stays neutral scenario for the Anglo-French position in the Far East, should the Japanese even dare attack. For example, if the Japanese dare attack Indochina in late 1940, the...
  3. R

    AHC: French Indochina is never Japanese occupied in WWII

    With the survivors who land cut down by local forces cut down by FIC forces augmented with some Indian troops, esp. some Gurkhas, and some Chinese crossed over the border to provide numbers. Both of these are creative and interesting solutions!
  4. R

    AHC: French Indochina is never Japanese occupied in WWII

    Here is the challenge- there must be a World War Two with American and Soviet theaters in Europe against Germany, and American and Soviet theaters (even if brief) against Japan in the Asia-Pacific. However, in contrast to OTL, French Indochina never ends up Japanese occupied during this war.
Back
Top