Search results for query: *

Old Left would never bitch about conscription for fighting WWII enemies. Think New Left has a generational change of heart? Or far Right people, Ku Klux'ers bitch and moan?

@Simon Darkshade from another board opined about gross American, and especially British *industrial* underpreparedness to support quantitavely the war effort needed against the Axis. And how the disabling of nuke tech sidelines a major share of the uptime 1993 navies (nuclear propelled subs...

Let's look at economic consequences - For the Axis, already under blockade, fewer direct ill effects, except those that come from impact of alterations to military operations of their besieged economies. However, In the case of Germany, its borders with several 1943 neutral nations see those...

Thank you for clarifying.

I get why relocations might, because it makes it easier for moderns, but wouldn't *keeping* nukes ruin it more? By turning it into 'Hitler's Nazi Germany gets nuked into surrender/oblivion, same happens to Japan [if not from USA, from China], then clean up, the end'...

The PRC's minimum sphere of interest in this is obvious, getting the Japanese TFO their country! And their next level interests are fairly obvious too, their immediate land neighbors and immediate offshore neighbors. What does India see as its minimum and maximum spheres and interest, and how...

He's not around, he doesn't ISOT back - it's 1993 Moscow, and Yeltsin There aren't any Soviets, except for Partisan bands behind the 1943 German lines. Remember, this is a matter for the future, these are 1943 Germans we are dealing with here.

What if all Axis occupied territories and their maritime EEZs from July 15th, 1943 are ISOT to July 15th 1993? Here are the relevant maps - close enough, maps as of 1 July European-Mediterranean Theater: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/1943-07-01GerWW2BattlefrontAtlas.jpg...