Search results for query: *

  1. prinCZess

    Impeachment

    Question about result basically is. There's still days worth of Senators giving speeches justifying their votes on witnesses and mugging to the cameras for reelection hopes if they're up for it this year, before the final vote is taken. But the witness vote tells the story of how things will end...
  2. prinCZess

    Impeachment

    To share/steal an analogy I heard that I found amusing on this subject: The impeachment is kind've like if America's political parties were watching entirely different movies. Republicans are watching Hoover, and noting how this is all a tale of insider government intrigues and abuses targeting...
  3. prinCZess

    Impeachment

    That seems to be one of those murky grey areas of law where, since nothing's specified and we've not been through this very much before to come up with a stable organizational table for it, every interpretation is permitted. But Pelosi withholding the articles makes no sense to me. Mitch...
  4. prinCZess

    Impeachment

    This is actually one of the few convincing arguments I've heard both on this specific and on the general point of 'committee meetings shouldn't be televised'. They seem to incessently become a game of politicians trying to grandstand and curry media soundbites and snippets, snipe at opponents in...
  5. prinCZess

    Impeachment

    Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin in West Virginia, with Tester of Montana more arguably, would seem to contest that? McCaskill of Mississippi (I think?) could also count, though she got replaced in 16. Probably more in the house less well-known.
Back
Top