Search results

Well, since they're the most-discussed weapon as of late, here's where fixation on the AR-15 apparently came from:

Fresh video from Don’t Walk, Run! Productions:

Speaking of self-defense:

Who: Shane Killian or the guy he’s dunking on? For reference, Shane Killian is an An-Cap Libertarian who can be rather shouty, but also has lots of interesting content on cybersecurity and economics, for instance. Not to mention all things Libertarian (as you might figure). The other guy is...

Latest in irate takedowns from Shane Killian:

Had heard “rumors” about that, yeah, though these are much more specific examples than what I’ve come across. Kinda’ reminds me of the Waukesha Christmas Parade, actually, as while the attack itself was covered, pretty much nothing was said about the perpetrator or the fact he was a radicalized...

Wait, really?! In that case, guess another shooting the media will quickly memory-hole, courtesy of the perpetrator belonging to one of their “protected groups”. :cautious:

Styx weighing in on the Nashville shooting:

Some disappointing news from Styx:

Another one from Shane Killian:

Could probably have gone in other (related) threads, but since I'd be remiss not to post it:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/monterey-park-shooting-california-governor-gavin-newsom-second-amendment/

I see... As I said, I find it odd how we still allow rapists, arsonists, and murderers to have public defenders, but not red-flagged gun owners who may very well be innocent. I'm not a gun guy, but even ignoring the suspect constitutionality of it, this double standard right here tells me...

Yeah, I wondered if that might be why. (Although, knowing these people, there must more bureaucratic terrible-ness in there than just that.) For what, being accused of firearm-related crimes? Guns are dangerous tools, no doubt, but considering how we allow rapists, arsonists, and murderers to...

What's in the bill that's got people so worked up, exactly? Admittedly, I haven't been paying attention, and reading through the actual thing is too much legalese for me to stomach. (That, and the media is a shit source when it comes to guns, "assault-style rifles" and all.)

Thought so, thanks. Unfortunately, the Right hasn’t had nearly as much success labelling lefty activists and pundits who don’t know basic terminology that can be Googled with the click of a button as the reverse. (e.g.: Demonization of “climate-change deniers” and all that.)

Now, I'm not a gun guy by any stretch, but my understanding is that using terms like "assault weapon" or "assault-style weapon" are a telltale sign of illiteracy when it comes to firearms? (Branding them "assault rifles" is even worse, I'd think, seeing as civilians are barred from owning fully...

In which case, there will be no investigation of (much less consequences for) the school, or the random nobody who decided you were dangerous and called in to begin with. (Although, hopefully, red-flagging someone who clearly wasn’t in the wrong will fall under filing a false police report...

Jackhole? Did you mean "jackass", "asshole", or some portmanteau of the two? :p