Search results

The issue is that unless we're talking about preventing North Korea's 'might not even hit target' nukes, any first world nuclear power can probably oversaturate all but the most costly defensive system. The difference between 'nuked back to the stoneage' and 'nuked back to the stoneage times...

Pretty sure the citizens of New York, or Washington DC might not appreciate hearing how you 'mitigated damage' as 80% of them get wiped off the planet instead of 100%.

Not going to lie, ABM systems do seem like a waste of money. They're never going to be able to hit 'all' the missiles, and it only takes a few to permanently alter a nation's progress. Would make more sense to just build some extra nukes to send the message of 'we're not going to defend...

MODDDDDDDD FIGHT! *Running around* MOD FIGHT EVERYBODY! ITS ON!