Search results

You continue to assert this, yet I see no evidence of your claim. I also find it peculiar that you fix your reaction entirely on my fourth point, and seemingly -- no, in fact, blatantly -- ignore the other points. They argue against your position; you have not refuted the points, however. Merely...

1. One cannot claim rights one denies to others. 2. The ADL actively and consistently tries to deny free speech to others; this pursuit is in fact their "core business", in practice. 3. The ADL, therefore, cannot claim free speech. 4. Therefore, we do not need to defend them. 5. In fact...

In practice, the ADL is one of the most anti-Jewish organisations you can find in America. In the same way that BLM is one of the most anti-black organisations. They are ludicrously harmful to the people whose supposed interests they pretend to serve.

I disagree, @Lord Sovereign has arrived at the correct conclusion-- and your own argument (esp. "they are worth nothing because they don't stand for the rights of people they disagree with") hints towards that same conclusion. Why? Because the ADL (which is much worse than the ACLU, as far as...

It was well worth reading.