Search results for query: *

  1. Sixgun McGurk

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    No, I have until December 1941 to get large numbers of Shermans to the Philippines, Wake and Guam. I'm not going to fuck around with plans while the Japanese are killing my peopIe. I know the M4 Sherman works reliably and can be made in numbers with common industrial components in time to make...
  2. Sixgun McGurk

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    AV1790 The engine, transmission are the problem. None of them existed off the shelf. The Sherman's Wright R950 and Spicer 5 speed were simple, reliable and available aircraft and truck variants. If there was a way to back mount them then sure, but I'm sure there was a good reason we're stuck...
  3. Sixgun McGurk

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    I don't think it could be accomplished in time not to adversely effect Sherman production. The learning curve is already very steep.
  4. Sixgun McGurk

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    The Germans have been well covered, but from the US side, I would try to skip the whole idiotic Priest and go straight to the Sherman, but with better radios, wider tracks and a bigger motorized turret. I would try to introduce a 105 mm smoothbore sabot AT gun with a good infantry killer shell...
Back
Top