Search results

That'd be the guy who said after the 2014 annexation of Crimea that Russia wouldn't go after the rest of Ukraine? That it was wrong to think of them as having imperial ambitions? I guess I shouldn't be surprised an idiot who was claiming right up to the day of invasion that Russia would never...

Or, at least that's the official party line. Wether they truly believe it is neither certain nor important. But, that's also irrelevant to what I was saying, which is that doubting Clinton saying Putin doesn't intend to honour the memorandum is... Well, stupid. Since objective reality has made...

Uh huh... But, do you think Russia intends to honour the Budapest memorandum? Coz to me it seems like they've pretty thoroughly torn that to shreds and burnt the scraps. Trusting Clinton doesn't really enter into it. The initial article is a massive nothingburger, doubting it is even more pointless.

Seriously, what is the point of attacking his credibility? Do you really hope to convince people that in fact Russia does intend to guarantee the security of Ukraine as they previously promised? Coz you're going to face a bigger hurdle than making people doubt Clinton.

I mean... All he's saying is Putin had told him he didn't feel bound by past guarantees of Ukrainian protection. Present events make it abundantly clear that he doesn't. Maybe he's making up that Putin told him but that seems entirely pointless, just as much as doubting this does.

What the flying fuck does the payload fraction matter, you mouth breathing moron? You claimed the US overreacted to a weather balloon. It blatantly isn't, as evidenced by the size of the structure, and those very solar panels you seem so keen to dismiss. The pictures have been plenty in evidence...

Eh... Fair. I guess my angle of debate was coloured by mentally conflating your response with some others. I might quibble some about your 3rd paragraph, but there's no point arguing semantics of minor details of an already over explored tangent. Generally agree with the majority of that post.

Uh huh... And Napoleon started with the resources of France, one of the top 2-3 countries of Europe, and therefore the world at the time. He ended up not even ruling St Helena. Alexander started with Macedon, a nation comparable to a dozen of it's local neighbours. He ended up dying whilst still...

Arranging things so that you fight as often as possible with the advantage doesn't make you a less impressive leader, it makes you a smart one. Also, Alexander didn't exactly start out with a massive empire. Napoleon is often over rated, with a lack luster record on and off the battlefield. Even...

Oh... That's just sad. 😟

Ackshually, Biden is a known Chinese puppet. Ergo, if his administration did any such thing it's because china wanted it, so how can that be aggressive? So nope, china are the ones provoking aggression and Biden needs to harden up, break free and find some real way to punish them.

I mean, to be fair, there probably is some kind of contingency plan for how they would do it if the political leadership went insane and called for it, or if the situation actually needed it. They have plans foreverything. But contingency planning hardly indicates intentions, even if such plans...

Lying liar lies, losers lap it up.

You could be right. That would be a dumber stance to my mind, not least because it can equally easily be applied to Agent23.

Good for you. You can better judge people by their own deeds and words, and Agent23 has straight up and unequivocally cheered for baby murder. But if me disliking him matters more to you, your messed up perspective and priorities are your own and I couldn't care less what you think.

It's a sad day in a strange world when I feel the need to agree with and amplify anything coming from one of the few people I truly despise, but here we are. I guess if even trump can do two or three things right, it shouldn't surprise me that Agent23 can manage one.

I still maintain that if we could magically zap away the nuclear issue, Poland alone could probably drive through to Moscow and occupy it at this point. Whilst that might be sorta debatable, the mere fact that it is hangs a lampshade on how ridiculous the Russian nationalist fear mongering about...

Weren't the Russian government boasting a couple months back about how they could easily hit London with a nuclear missile strike in like 12 minutes or something? And obviously almost every other European capital in even less. Certainly feels like a rather moot point as to exactly which missile...

Didn't you say much the same thing about them invading Ukraine?