Search results

"Managed decline" is the "moderate left" doctrine for running the country. The US ideological right's goal, from what know, is to either sort this shit out or fail trying, they are uninterested in contributing to the "managed decline". Also, 500 years? Things happened on the timescale when news...

And i was referring the trap the "populares" route took Rome into. What good is winning by inviting and bribing immigrants, if they in turn will tear the country apart once the going gets tough and bribes run out anyway? That's why populist policies, even if you make a good case for them, should...

That's the thing, is spending limited political and economic capital to help groups considering themselves separate from "most Americans" the right way to win and retain power? In your Roman analogy, that's the equivalent of spending Roman's taxes to pay barbarians to defend Rome from other...

Alliances require common cause. In this case the cause is contradictory. It would be a match of who backstabs the other first, and considering some factional dynamics, it would not work out well for the right. Are you taking a piss here or what? Of course most white males in America identify as...

>less likely to lose Here's the problem, you think that, those who disagree think this would be an idiotic attempt to gain few percent of support at most while pissing off several times as many core voters among nationalist and anti-immigration factions especially. They support the GOP because...

The fundamental problem with nationalists trying to woo minorities is that unlike leftists they are uninterested in shitting on own country and giving them special favors in it. Sure, something could be figured out with groups that are doing fine and aren't trying to fuck up the country like...