How is being pissed at Islamist bullshit interfering with NATO membership applications "stanning for liberals"?
I'm tired of your bullshit racism. Look at a map and stop being illiterate. If Finland joins NATO Sweden can't even be invaded, but even if they are "mutual defense" Sweden being conquered is no threat to America fuck them.
Russia has already made noises about Gotland Island, and they can access that from Kaliningrad/Konigsberg.
Dude my people hate the Turks we fought them for centuries when they actually were an empire and tried to impose Islam. But they are better than the Swedes. I swear I hope conservacucks end up having their children raised by gay or trans couples because every action you take makes those leftists stronger so you and your children should suffer for it.
Wrong, it may give benefits in the earthly life. What it will fail to do is give the ultimate benefit which is eternal salvation, as only Christ can save. But even then it's not sure, I like Christianity's chances of beating Islam more than I like it's chances of overtaking atheist liberalism. Atheists are the least likely group to accept the gospel. So I prefer Muslims to atheists. Also at least Muslims have morals that are slightly based on truth just like religious Jews do.
This kind of talk is exactly why I'm worried about the supposed Christian revival Cherio has been predicting; because I'm almost certain you lot would damn the world trying to save it from itself, just as many amongst the regressive left are in the process of doing.
What are you talking about? Letting liberal nations become Islamic wouldn’t destroy anything. Christianity is the truth but other traditional religions can run stable societies. Islam while being a historical enemy have had stable societies, only silly US evangelicals don’t think Islam is a traditional religion.
The problem is Mecca, or rather what Mohammed ordered his followers to do when he conquered it. A religion where it is a positive good to break oaths and contracts if they're with non-coreligionists is not a religion compatible with civilization unless it is the only surviving religion.
Do you take the same view towards Judaism? Do you know the story of Hamor, and the circumcised city? Political groups sometimes betray others, you have to show that they are worse than other groups. And Islam has survived with other religions. The only ones it is required to destroy are pagans. It is true that Christians and Jews would be second class citizens but they would exist, which is a better faith than under liberalism where they would surely be attempts to kill them off.
My logic is that if it is possible it is best to make enemy of my enemy is my friend. Muslims are the closest non Christian religion to us, therefore unless there are pressing issues that make an alliance unacceptable(like the Muslims are currently attacking us like with the Ottoman wars) then we should be more friendly to Muslims than to pagans. Pagans are also closer to us than atheists, so we should be nicer to pagans than to atheists. You see there is a ladder.
Why are you so eager to build a straw man of me? It's especially ironic that you use Jack Chick, given I'm a chronic D&D player and DM.
If you can't tell the difference between peoples' sins being recorded as sins and a prophet speaking for the source of all morality in his religion directing his followers in his office as prophet to commit evil there is no point speaking to you.
You grew up in the Muslim world? Really where I did not know that, I thought you were from America and were some kind of evangelical or at best a Baptist.
Do you have proof that the incident was recorded as a sin? It was just told neutrally it did not say if it was good or bad. Though there is slight praise towards it even.
So what contracts you are talking about? I see nothing wrong with ending polytheism, and banning theft, adultery, infanticide, and bearing false witness.
No I don't think conservatives have tried to get the votes of these people in a smart way. Conservative outreach at most is them just explaining conservative ideals, they don't specifically try to woe certain segments of the population(except for big business) let's use Asians as an example. Conservatives simply say "Affirmative action is wrong people should not be given a leg up because of their race, every person should be treated equally and judges solely by merit." Conservatives always try to play this stupid high minded bullshit instead of getting right down to Asians and telling them "Affirmative action hurts your people and here is why" they also don't use the tactics that work for the left like removing statues of FDR or other people during world war 2 that implemented internment, or they don't condemn atomic bombings. Quite simply they should start trying to win the Asian vote and tell them that the democrats have historically oppressed Asians bring up the Chinese Exclusion act and how racial discrimination against their people was mostly done in California by the ancestors of the people in power there the democrats. Is it race baiting? I don't care, the democrats are the enemy. And thats just to start, I mean the only non white group the right can count on the support of consistently is Cubans because they actually escaped a communist nation. But no the right needs to remove any lingering racism, and meet with the leaders of racial groups that can be won over maybe Imams for the Arab muslims, or see if there is some pan asian group for Asians like the NAACP is for blacks and start making alliances with them.
The fundamental problem with nationalists trying to woo minorities is that unlike leftists they are uninterested in shitting on own country and giving them special favors in it. Sure, something could be figured out with groups that are doing fine and aren't trying to fuck up the country like said Asians, but that's about it. You don't want to make the islamic lobby more comfortable and feeling more welcome, you want them out, you know it and they know it (or know you will want them out once they get further if you have any brains left).
