Search results for query: *

  1. Lord Sovereign

    Would Segregation have been wrong if it really was separate but equal?

    I myself wouldn't call taxation "theft", as it is the price one pays for law, order and the defence of the realm, but it can be catastrophically overdone. Too much tax can ruin a country just as much as a rampaging army, and it's usually the result of that core malady: the government getting...
  2. Lord Sovereign

    Would Segregation have been wrong if it really was separate but equal?

    No, because you muppets don't seem to understand that you are asking for legislation based on race. You cannot have wide reaching segregation without it.
  3. Lord Sovereign

    Would Segregation have been wrong if it really was separate but equal?

    "Those of African decent have slightly differently shaped skulls, thus we must start legislating based off race!" I feel there's a rather vast middle ground between those two statements, and I think it's worth exploring. Can we leave Jim Crow to the 1950s please?
  4. Lord Sovereign

    Would Segregation have been wrong if it really was separate but equal?

    (Sigh) No, keeping Jim Crow would not have abated the rise of the radical left and multi-culturalism. In fact, it would probably have made it worse. Or did you think I don't know what these daft questions are almost always about? Not everything that came before, or even "opposed" modernity, is...
Back
Top