Search results for query: *

EG: Let's say an American businessman has business in a foreign country (idk they own a hotel or something). Is that legitimate pretext for surveillance?

The impression I consistently get from you is that you've got no idea what "context" there might be either, except maybe in a vague generality that could mean pretty much anything. You were just told at some point that there was context, and you trust this because you are far too personally...

Hmmm the rules say they don't though so clearly they don't. Don't you trust the glow-in-the-dark-americans? /s

Off topic, but I mean that's just true. The US "allies" are pretty much just the outer imperial provinces. I'm not too worried if the washington, london, etc. octupi spy on each other. Although if (as the glowies and pro-glowies allege) it's expected that they do so, then it's absolutely...

Conservatives have a bad habit of saying something obviously true but and then adding something to the effect of "wow, that'd be really bad though so I'm going to hope it's not that." We saw what happened with a fairly similar situation with Bradley Manning. It was not any more effective...