Search results for query: *

Rebooting Harry Potter, I think, isn't going to work. Love them or hate them, movies and actors/actresses, the cast and original films defined Harry Potter, just like how Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings Trilogy defined Lord of the Rings, despite there being previous (animated) adaptions...

Fucking hell, I wouldn't wish that on fucking Morgoth, let alone Sauron.

Velma. 'nuff said. :cry:

"Get a turbine ready, Jeff!"

Remember that actress that had a freakout over the fans not liking the dumpster fire she was starring in? Yeah, I think she's realized it's a sinking ship; she's immediately changed her tune. She's as stable as a bipolar chipmunk who dug up and ate some crack addict's garden stash.

Except in this day and age, even more films in Jackson's Universe are still going to be contaminated or viewed through a woke lens. They're still going to be fucking disasters because of it.

After what he did to Star Trek 09... :sick:

I noticed this as a headline while browsing through a newsfeed, but I didn't click on/read it. It did, however, contain "[,,,]for modern audiences[...]" in the article's description, and that alone made me facepalm. Modern audiences, to Hollywood? Didn't the Saint's Row reboot use that...