Search results

Thinking on it, defining "breach of property rights" as socialism is also false because socialism does respect property rights: its opinion is all property belongs to the state, and the state allows people to use its property. And, well, that is partially true in all states: all property within...

Yeah, watering socialism down to "anything people do together" is not I think a useful form to use, since, as we see above with Julio92 that basically lets one define not killing children as socialism, which makes the underlying beliefs that make socialism such a monstrorous belief system...

Well, if any social obligation or government control is socialism, then every human society and every conceivable human society is socialist, in which case calling something socialist is equivalent to just calling it human, and thus means nothing. Everyone has limits to what they can own, and...

Eh, but war requires just cause, and thus the ability to articulate some principle. If you buy a car, you get drunk and and crash it, then thrash the car salesmen, your an irrational fool who's a danger to society. If you buy a car, and it breaks within a week and you and punch the salemen in...

Ah, but where is the line between "colonization" and legitimate business? Thus the slipperyness of the question. @Bear Ribs . Hm, maybe putting into more "liberal" terminology, some sort of expansion on "inalienable rights". Like, its currently understood that there are certain things you can't...

One of the under discussed problems that helped lead to the Rise of Nazism was the take over of much of the property of Germany by foreigners, especially after the inflation. This helped build the feeling of disenfranchisement and a sense of Germany being a colony of foreign powers. Most hated...