Search results

No idea, all I know is that if unidentified intruders burst into my home in the middle of the night, I'm going to take my chances exercising my legal right to self defense, and I'll deal with the smoke after, or be dead.

Alternatively, he shoots them all dead completely legally.

I would say feminist judge. Plenty of women disagree with her ruling, and plenty of men agree with it. It just some more anecdotal proof of the Disposable Males Hypothesis.

This is why you just start shooting when unidentified intruders break into your home.

Weird, almost like we should have the same test done by more than one person to avoid things like this.

Well all I can do is defend myself and hope I take some of my attackers with me then. I have zero qualms about utilizing my civil rights, personally I'd like to resolve it in court, but if I'm not going to be given the opportunity I see no reason not use the rights granted to me by the...

Like I said, I'll take my chances in court. My life and my families life are worth more than a dog's, and the dog will be dead regardless.

If a police dog attacks me or a family member for no reason, I'm killing it and taking my chances in court.

Remember Conservatives, the police are not your friends. At best, they are necessary for the enforcement of law, at worst, they are literally a gang of thugs.

J. Edgar Hoover was nearly as much of a thug as any of the men he tracked down. He was always willing to break the law and commit unconstitutional acts so long as it made him and his personal mafia (the FBI) look good/increased their power. When an institution starts from such a low point it...

I'm increasingly of the opinion that most of the "good" cops were driven out following the summer of love, anyone still left in the various police departments are not worthy of a "back the blue" mentality.