Search results for query: *

It's important to note that Harrisons August 1945 report was referring to how the US Military was treating Displaced Persons and the Report stated that the only change was replacing SS Guards with US Army soldiers. Eisenhower himself was insulted and offended by the comparison. But Patton was...

I just saw a video by Mark Felton about the first encounter between M26 Pershings and T-34's in the Korean War. In the last minute of the video he actually lays out the ratios of tank kills to losses of three major tanks versus the T-34. M26's knocked out 38 T34's and in return lost 6 to T34...

Binkov actually did a video on the Cold War never going cold and starting right at the Summer/Fall of 1945 or whatever while everyone still had their forces in Europe (and Japan wouldn't be too much of an issue).

I dunno. After a period of reflection I honestly don't see the US winning except maybe in 1945 (not counted) and 1989. The Soviets would win conventionally (or at least non-strategic nuclearly) in every other scenario IMHO. Then from increased competition to lack thereof... 1983 Able Archer...

https://history.army.mil/html/books/045/45-3-1/cmhPub_45-3-1.pdf So according to this, in 1956... Good grief the US loves disarming themselves after every war. Though I guess all of these facts and figures don't matter too much considering how all of this was intended for the ATOMIC...

Well it looks like 1948 isn't going to be that interesting. It'd be a steamroll. Same with 1950. But yeah, the adage that the US Army was terrible when it went into Korea and came out looking good and then the inverse happening with Vietnam kinda seems right. 1956 and 1961 are probably far more...

We're going to need some orders of battle or something to look up all of the stats and have nerdgasms over them. Especially for the less common timelines (where I think the Redss have an even greater advantage like in... all of the conflicts except for the 1989 scenario :p ). Though the 1956 and...