Search results for query: *

I watch most of Critical Drinkers videos. He's had good podcast/interviews with Sebastian Gorka and Triggernometry (second one more then the first). I've posted and comment on them alot actually. Surprised you missed that. I'd post more of his stuff but the General Movie Thread is basically a...

As @Blasterbot intimated earlier, none of the war journalists are shown as particularly awesome people. I think it might show that war journalism is a pretty dangerous job and I find the characters pretty interesting and complex and their motivations/how they think to be pretty interesting as...

Pretty sure everyone was shitting on the movie here (me included) until it came out and then some people made the thought crime of liking the movie.

Not as bad as the plot of 1917.

Secessionist rabble has 4th and 5th Generation Jets, main battle tanks, fleets of helicopters, and many multitudes of armored vehicles of various classes in the movie as well. 😱

Plot made more sense then We Were Soldiers.

The US Navy would be loyally on the side of the President who has overstayed into a third unconstitutional term as President, has launched airstrikes on American civilians, and executed journalists as enemy combatants? There's not much world building going on but there's drips and drops. You...

A Civil War where "four Carrier Battlegroups" negates a Civil War occurring in the first place sounds like an utterly fascinating setting to explore.

Plot makes about as much sense as The Siege of Jadotville.

There wasn't exactly a very stable frontline or interior lines going on. The meat of the movie is a journey from New York City to Washington DC where the Federal Forces ostensibly have control of the Northeast. But traveling through that area, it's pretty clear its quite porous. Also a third...

Yeah... another way to look at it is that it just takes place in an AU. Just because our Texas and California right now are on different sides means that it could or should be in a film that may take place in the near future. I will point out, I was going to save this for maybe a thicker later...

Haven't seen Critical Drinkers take on it but if that's one of his serious issues with the film, if it was Montana and Illinois teaming up 99.99% of the film would probably be the same. EDIT: I feel so far it signified plenty. People are kinda hung up on the lack of fleshing out the world...

Just saw the movie, was encouraged to after seeing the mixed reaction all weekend and this thread as well kinda motivated me to actually watch a movie by myself in theater instead of going with somebody. Anyways I just saw it so in my experience I think pretty highly of a movie right after...

In regards to the movie itself, I've heard mixed things. I do kinda want to see it in theater based on said mixed reactions, because I really do like War Films and I'm told the war scenes in this film are pretty cool supposedly and I've liked several of Alex Garlands films over the years like...

There's a difference between journalism and war journalism though. The latter can take some serious balls to engage in, even if you are a Godless liberal journalist. It's not a metaphorical biopic about how stunning and brave Don Lemon is sitting in a studio... I'm assuming. Just read some...

Some of the action bits shown in the trailer do look pretty cool. What kind of American are you? Me at the US Capitol Building. :ROFLMAO: :love::devilish: THE ONE IN FALLOUT 3!!! That Capitol! 😬

https://fallout.fandom.com/wiki/Gatling_laser Looks like my potential Fallout suspicions have been confirmed.

Second Trailer Dropped

To be frank, if I were writing such a series as this, I'd make it in the vein of Red Dawn. Only more flag waving. Like literal flags waving like the opening cutscene of World in Conflict. Also improbable military industry still fully functioning so we can have massive tank battles. I'd throw in...

Another scene from this movie leaked actually. Mel Gibson continues to choose the based side of acting roles.