Search results for query: *

No, you can just look towards fully fleshed out ethical and ideological systems. There are such things that we call "first principles" and "universals" and so on that provide us a fine basis to build upon. Which is probably why we should turn to first principles and then debate those.

I am going to ask, what is wrong, in the general sense of the world with allowing the religious to have their say in the government? As long as the barrier of non-interference between church and state affairs holds, and each respects the role of the other, I don't see the harm. I want them to...