Search results for query: *

Now this, I can believe.

But they did? Literally the FBI photo you were citing up thread shows them searching one of them they had de-masked and then they later released their mugshots once they had them processed in the station. Because they're surrounded by cops with guns and a legal right to shoot them if they...

I may have misjudged my audience then; correct me please?

They've marched on D.C. eight times now, six times before the now famous march in December. If it's some slow burn op, they've been marching on D.C. since 2019; they've had almost two years of marches with nothing happening. If it's meant to be some discrediting op, why would they pick December...

How about you cite me where I said any of that and then we will talk, since we both know you're projecting here.

If you see this as a nothingburger, then why did you originally post about them in this thread? If it was Feds trying to discredit "Conservatives" as the original narrative was, how come they committed no violence-only walking around as you note-both times? If it was meant to serve as a moral...

Then why keep commenting then? For someone so uninterested as you claim, you seem very wound up enough to debate on this unprovoked. I didn't start this conversation with you, dude.

So, again, you invent a new narrative that is even more schizophrenic; now not being covered by the media is a sign of being a Glowie lol? Which way is it? The original argument was that the heavy media coverage was a sign of them being Feds to discredit "Conservatives", and now the opposite is...

No, you gave it attention the first time because "Conservative" handlers seeded that narrative with no evidence because everyone was caught off guard by the march and thus the "Glowies" narrative was an attempt to limit it. If your argument is because "they know the jig is up" then why did the...

If you feel it is a "Glowie" Plot to undermine the "Right" should you not afford them attention as a threat? Or, rather, does this exactly prove what I was pointing out earlier; it's not "Glowies", which is why it's getting no attention now. The reason it did the first time is because they ran a...

They did another march, literally just yesterday.

Patriot Front marched in D.C. again the other day; no Glowie claims conspicuously.

In what way are they not and what are you even asking?

You rejected it because it precisely demolishes what you're arguing, that's why you immediately defaulted to claiming I have no idea but then you can't be bothered to actually demonstrate that. It also leads to a logical disconnect herein later in your post where you cite a video arguing that PF...

Because it was very clearly meant to be sarcasm; I literally copied and pasted your first sentence and then changed the words from PF to Lotus Eaters. Your original point was that is was suspicious they didn't have a written form of their viewpoints when some quick searching revealed they have...

If Lotus Eaters put the effort into making a video about Patriot Front why not do the much easier move of outlining their own points in text on their website, which would be easier and faster? Patriot Front, after all, have an entire manifesto online, in text for exactly this purpose. Perhaps...

Cool, now show me those are fake identities, which would be easy to prove because they would lack the easily verifiable information. Didn't claim they were either, but that's a goalpost shift because originally you were talking about another group and now you've switched to Proud Boys so it's...

How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt should be required reading for anyone who claims to be a serious Right Wing activist.

Because if you're trying to run a secret Fed op, allowing Antifa to expose the members of that and allowing the public to check their background rather quickly blows that up, no? Seriously the barest amount of critical thinking shows how schizophrenic this line of thinking is. Because the...

"You're not fat and retarded, so obviously you're a Fed." - t. Conservative, 2021.