Search results for query: *

Okay here are a few statement's I found that were from his journals “Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” And another. Patton wrote. He told of taking his commander...

Okay my source of information might have been flawed or biased I will have to doublecheck

Patton had his problems but he wasn't as bad as you make him to be as I haven't seen many failures on his part that resulted from it. The main problems and flaws of the man were. He was overly brash as a commander. He was biased against some individuals infamously those with PTSD and Jews...

Don't also forget the T-34 used diesel instead of the M4's gasoline as well as had a lower profile the M4 was no doubt a better quality tank than the T-34 but it has a lot of flaws which drag it down.

The Chinese used human wave tactics in Korea with horrendous results for both them as well as NK And for people who would dispute this while I acknowledge the t-34 was a better tank in a few way's than the shermans these t-34's were being commanded by Norks with nowhere near as good training as...

Which China? the commie one? or the one under a Nationalist Dictator?

What does that have to do with anything? Your original statement was. The above implies that you think the 1945 USSR would win and you further state that they would win because. Which I said was bogus because the USSR. Was more exhausted than the U.S. due to the insane casualties it took...

What do you mean hindsight?

This reply should have been made a while ago but the fact is that your argument is full of holes. First, it ignores that the soviet puppets in Eastern were far more ravaged than the French or British were. Second, it ignores the fact that the U.S. was far from exhausted at this point unlike...

This too, the U.S. military went through a strange phase before the Korean war were they thought the advent of nukes and modern bombers made every branch of the military but the Airforce obsolete and so they neglected other branches.

Yes, but did it cause the north to win? No, the war was won for the Norks when China swept in and won with human wave tactics the Norks tech didn't help the only reason they won initially was due to the small size of U.S. forces and once reinforcement's arrived the U.S. tactically beat the Norks...

Stop acting like it was out of stupidity or maliciousness, the fact was that the U.S. had yet to get the next line of military equipment out because it had turned it's attention straight to the Marshall plan and domestic issue's after the war unlike the Soviet Union which instead mostly ignored...