Search results for query: *
- Users: Buba
- With WI Second Sino-Japanese War was fought 4 years in advance? (starting in 1933 not 1937) thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
WI Second Sino-Japanese War was fought 4 years in advance? (starting in 1933 not 1937)
Soviets fighting Japan in China - how? No way that they are the attackers. Logistics ... And the state of the Red Army at that time. Poland had a military treaty with France. The British "guarantees", if you read the text carefully, are meaningless, vague "blah blah".- Word Count: 46
- Buba
- Post #16
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
WI Second Sino-Japanese War was fought 4 years in advance? (starting in 1933 not 1937)
The IJN has the Hosho, Kaga and Akagi. And the freshly commissioned "looks about to turn turtle" small carrier with name starting with "R". IMO there need not be some spectacular success - IMO quite a few Officers will take notice what happens when the Japanese show up with a floating airfield...- Word Count: 88
- Buba
- Post #12
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
WI Second Sino-Japanese War was fought 4 years in advance? (starting in 1933 not 1937)
Lots of interesting reading, thanks! 1 - Poland was a net importer of oil. And about to commit economic suicide, so it does not benefit in any way. 2 - Panay Incident happens as in OTL? Is news of it supressed like in OTL? 3 - in OTL the Sino-Japanese War did not bring about rearmament by...- Word Count: 130
- Buba
- Post #9
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
WI Second Sino-Japanese War was fought 4 years in advance? (starting in 1933 not 1937)
No, ignorant :)- Word Count: 2
- Buba
- Post #7
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion