Search results

  1. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    I took a look at Italy. Hmm ... my ideas: 1 - start spamming Semovente 75/18 or - better - 75/34 in late '39; 2 - kill the L6/40; 3 - kill the M11/39 or use it for training. Put the M13/40 into production ASAP to train tankers and keep industry busy while I grasp for something better. 4 - I'm...
  2. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    1 - in my "I'm the German AFV Shogun" post cancelling the Pz.III was one of the first things to do :) 2 - thanks for pointing out that gun - I knew that what ended up as the L43 had some sort of earlier competitor but I knew next to nothing about it. This gun saves the hassle of developing the...
  3. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    No cupola on Jagdpanzers? Funny - never noticed :) Must had been some sort of executive decision, as the StuG III had it. By the time the T-34/85 rolls out, the war is lost. Like I said in my post - if made a German Panzer Tsar Shogun Supremo Overlord - I don't care beyond mid 1942. Starting...
  4. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    What you described is pretty much the Valentine. Indeed its manufacture could be greatly simplified. I don't have the figures on hand, but the price difference (as much as prices have a meaning in a command economy) between the Pz.IV and Pz.VI is simply shocking. Thing is the Pz.VI was designed...
  5. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    The Pz.IV was good enough for this. Simply have the F model with 7,5cm/L43 in quantity in 1941.
  6. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    It was the Pz.IV chassis mated with StuG casematte which had been designed to be plopped on top of the Pz.III chassis :) Preach on Brother, I have your back! On another tangent - Schurzen in '39/40 - good idea? Protects sides against AT rifles and cannon at lower cost in weight and money than...
  7. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    The StuG IV has joined the chat ... :) IMO the Panzer III/IV is too late to bother with. Something like it should had been done in the '40-42 timeframe, not '44.
  8. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    No, IMO the best possible summary of problems with German tank/vehicle engineering (and procurement) is this: That is a single track linked of a fucking tracked motorcycle. A tracked motorcycle which had double steering, i.e. could run without the wheel in front as it could steer with in its...
  9. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    Germany, starting 1.I.1939: 1 - anybody mentioning "interleaved wheel suspension" gets taken outside and beaten. If necessary I threaten with concentration camp. 2 - I kill the Pz.III and make Pz.IV the one and only chassis for everything. I bring forward the F model, i.e. with simplified lines...
  10. Buba

    You are in charge of armored vehicle doctrine and design in 1939...

    An early Cromwell/Comet would do nicely, thank you. :) My take - if British - prepare a cross between Valentine Mk.III and IX. With some tweaks - three man turret BUT with cupola, if necessary the radio ejected to a bolt on external box (like Firefly) in the rear, external mantlet+trunions moved...
Back
Top