Search results

Not really anything to do with the point I was making. The Supreme Court takes a dim view of the rich getting access to things that are illegal for the poor and that played into Roe vs. Wade. That said going off that logic, Epstein's island would appear to establish under Roe vs. Wade...

One of the arguments in Roe vs. Wade was the wealthy had easy access to abortion and the poor did not, though they aimed more at "Wealthy people go out of state or bribe doctors to do it on the sly, poor people can't." Legalizing abortion was thus a way to level the playing field. Making it...

No telling, but my general suspicion is "not very likely." It's pretty accepted now and mostly a scarecrow, nor is there any real reason to think the conservative justices would actually be inclined to do so. Democrats have been beating on the "Roe vs. Wade will be cancelled" drum for decades...

This would appear to be something that infringes on the constitution. Now the constitution does not say that justices are appointed for life, rather it says they "shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour " Now good behavior isn't clearly defined but impeachment is so it would appear that...