Search results

That's not how the fighting words doctrine works. Largely because subsequent case law has narrowed the category of fighting word to the point it effectively doesn't exist, but when it did exist, it applied to speech that when uttered was so vile, so hostile, so ugly as to be sufficiently...

This. Let's try to keep things a bit more on topic here. "Person on social media discusses Israel-Palestine conflict in simplistic, absolutest terms, ends up with really dumb take"....not exactly a shocking outcome.