Search results for query: *

Well, yes, because in even 1100 natural evolution could be observed taking place in the world around the monks, domestication of plants and animals, and such. They didn't have the name natural evolution to work with at that time, but they could still recognize it's effects and attribute it to...

Because a non-interventionist divinity undermines a lot of more zealous Christian dogmatics theological thinking and arguments. A Watchmaker God is much more 'boring' and less able to be used for moral, or literal, crusades.

No, it really isn't, when the debate isn't about whether evolution exists, but rather the how of it, in scientific fields. even how life began is a debate about specific details, not the pseudo-religious debate LordsFire implies. We've seen tholians created by exposing organic compounds to...

Congrats on torpedoing the rest of your points with this garbage, and demonstrating why the GOP has such shit PR. Hint: trying to 'debate' whether evolution is real or not was solved long ago, and people like you who try to keep it alive because you see it as 'too complicated' (irreducible...