Search results for query: *

Ok, this is officially a dual timeline now, but prefix your answers with 1947 if you are discussing that AH. In any case I think that there might be more dangers back in 1947 exactly because Stalin is still alive. The guy is enough of a ruthless maniac to decide and ein with conventional...

Not really, they were putting missiles in Cuba because they wanted to counter the US missiles in Turkey. They lost some of those, and even if the commie politburo was as dumb and insane as you describe, they would not risk getting retaliated against with more nukes while China and the USA stay...

They lost a huge amount of their existing military, they are still licking their wounds after WWII and some other conflicts and they have to think of China and the USA, too. And Europe has the technical and manpower edge. They would be insane to try anything.

We might even get some skilled migrants FROM the USA, considering we will have more advanced technology and the like. We will be taking over most manufacturing from the USA, too, thank you very much.

That is still more nukes than the USSR had, and the french have a better strategic triad, and 300 not 200. More powerful and compact designs, too. And the USSR lost all it's military forces in Eastern Europe, that includes nukes, hundreds of thousands of their best troops and thousands of...

Here is the map: So, yeah, basically most of Europe. Technological and qualitive improvements in armaments can probably offset much of any remaining Soviet numerical advantage. Between the growing rift with the USSR, a lot of lost troops in Poland and East Germany and the like, and with the...

ASB is bored of all the "USA goes back in time..." timelines and decides to do something different for a change. So he grabs the continental EU(No UK or Ireland, or other overseas possessions aside from islands in the Mediterranean) and throws it 50 years back in time. What happens? EDIT: By...