Search results

I mean, sure we could put a reasonable limit on it, but it's still the right thing to do. Honestly, I'm not too worried compared to the humanitarian benefit this would provide, along with the long term brain drain this would inflict on China.

And I'm happy that the UK did. But the US, as the leader of the free world, should accept victims of communism that are fleeing, as we used to in the past. If you are concerned about spies, just never let them get into defense contracting. Putting a spy in as a refugee isn't all that useful.

I doubt this. Trump was consistently anti any immigration. In fact, the bill to support the Hong Kong stuff had some definite GOP support (Ted Cruz being an asshole ignored), but Trump didn't even back it. Trump actually actively harmed this by no longer considering Hong Kong separate than China...

At the very least, we could have opened up asylum to Hong Kongers, and I'm ashamed that Trump didn't do that. It was part of the reason I didn't end up voting for him (I didn't vote Biden either, it was between him and Jo Jorgensen).

Details?

Good on the UK. I wish Trump would do this as well in the US. We could use 3 million anti-communist voters.