Search results for query: *

Your first part is two issues, so I'll address them one at a time. That's not a valid excuse for being such scum. He started this all by knowingly lying. This is critical. He decided to use a real problem America had, and exploit it for personal gain despite the harm it would do to the country...

You see, I don't think the evidence available supports that opinion of McCarthy at all. His lie at the very beginning started it all. And he had no evidence prior to the hearings, and he presented no evidence. Given this, the most likely explanation for acts is some kind of self aggrandizing...

He was right in the same way a dice can add 2+2. He was a bad person, who exploited that the US government was infiltrated for personal gain. He had no evidence that such infiltration existed, he was just lucky enough that there were commies in the US government. He is one of the worst...

I mean, that was the first result I got. All I really needed was the cite for him changing numbers. I just clicked on the first result. If I wanted to prove something that had more questions about it, I'd look for a better source.

For my claim that he kept switching the numbers, from History.com: Note the key word is produced. He found some commies, because there were a ton. Anyone who blindly pointed to enough people in the state department could find some. The problem was he claimed to have evidence and had none, a...

The thing was, he didn't even have good intentions. Much like a soldier who stormed Normancy but was just there to kill legally, McCarthy was lying constantly, he was just nominally on the right side of history. And much like how that soldiers story is likely to end, he ended up causing more...